Subject:
|
Re: Should we be concerned?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 2 Jun 2003 22:09:15 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
339 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd wrote:
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
|
|
|
Im afraid I let my personal feelings out a bit-- Im still reeling from the
news that the ACLU deciding to defend that Florida women who wants her
drivers license photo ID taken with her veil on.
|
Im very glad the ACLU is there to take the case. I must say, I hope they
lose, and I presume they will since a drivers license is not a right, but it
doesnt bother me in the slightest that they took the case. Without the
ACLU, all we would have are corporate-shill attorneys, and they are the ones
who scare me.
|
Having an entity in theory such as the ACLU is probably a Good Thing®, but the
extreme, agenda-driving wackos currently running it make it a liability. As you
say, any idiot can see that this case has absolutely nothing to do with
religious freedom, that driving is a privilege, not a right, but simple
facts dont seem to concern these people. Without question there are ulterior
motives involved here-- and legislation from the bench is one of my
pet-peeves...
JOHN
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: Should we be concerned?
|
| (...) I'm very glad the ACLU is there to take the case. I must say, I hope they lose, and I presume they will since a driver's license is not a right, but it doesn't bother me in the slightest that they took the case. Without the ACLU, all we would (...) (21 years ago, 2-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
36 Messages in This Thread: ![Should we be concerned? -Dave Schuler (30-May-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -Scott Costello (31-May-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -Bruce Schlickbernd (31-May-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -Richard Marchetti (1-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -Scott Costello (2-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -Richard Marchetti (2-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -Aaron West (2-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -Scott Costello (4-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -Richard Marchetti (4-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -Aaron West (4-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -Chris Phillips (4-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -Richard Marchetti (4-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -Chris Phillips (4-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Digression on Johnson (was Re: Should we be concerned?) -Richard Marchetti (4-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -Bruce Schlickbernd (4-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -Dave Schuler (4-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -Scott Costello (4-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -Bruce Schlickbernd (2-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -John Neal (2-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -Dave Schuler (2-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -Bruce Schlickbernd (2-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -John Neal (2-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -David Koudys (2-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -John Neal (2-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -David Koudys (2-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -David Koudys (2-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -Bruce Schlickbernd (2-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -Richard Marchetti (3-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -Bruce Schlickbernd (3-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -John Neal (4-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -David Koudys (4-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -Richard Marchetti (4-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -Scott Arthur (3-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -John Neal (2-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![We needn't have worried! (Re: Should we be concerned?) -Dave Schuler (6-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|