Subject:
|
Re: Should we be concerned?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 4 Jun 2003 18:17:57 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
338 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Richard Marchetti wrote:
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Chris Phillips wrote:
|
Why do you suppose the FBI allowed 9/11 to happen? They had all the clues
sitting right there on their desks. Either they are completely inept or
else they decided that 3,000 civilian lives lost was a small price to pay to
advance their agenda of totalitarianism.
|
This part might be a little hardcore for me -- I would like to think it
cannot be true that it was allowed to happen, but then again...
|
I doubt very seriously that the Powers That Be really would have sat on their
hands if they knew 3,000 people would die. My point is that they had all the
clues and they should have had a better grip on what was about to happen than
they did. Even if they had little chance of preventing it from happening, the
record has shown that they actively ignored numerous warning signs. And this
when they were already supposedly re-vamping in order to avoid repeats of a
number of organizational failures of the recent past. So the public response is
to give them greater power and less accountability? That makes perfect sense to
me... NOT!!!
Im willing to be charitable and concede that it was probably simple ineptitude
on their part. But it is sad when the best-case scenario is that they dont
know what the Family theyre doing. Same thing with Dubya.
-Chris (The Pessemis)
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: Should we be concerned?
|
| (...) Exactly. This "with us, or against us" stuff is crazy. Why can't a person be wholly patriotic and still want a moment to figure out what might be the truly correct response to a crisis? (...) This is why I harp on people's apparent partisan (...) (21 years ago, 4-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
36 Messages in This Thread: ![Should we be concerned? -Dave Schuler (30-May-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -Scott Costello (31-May-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -Bruce Schlickbernd (31-May-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -Richard Marchetti (1-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -Scott Costello (2-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -Richard Marchetti (2-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -Aaron West (2-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -Scott Costello (4-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -Richard Marchetti (4-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -Aaron West (4-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -Chris Phillips (4-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -Richard Marchetti (4-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Digression on Johnson (was Re: Should we be concerned?) -Richard Marchetti (4-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -Bruce Schlickbernd (4-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -Dave Schuler (4-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -Scott Costello (4-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -Bruce Schlickbernd (2-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -John Neal (2-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -Dave Schuler (2-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -Bruce Schlickbernd (2-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -John Neal (2-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -David Koudys (2-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -John Neal (2-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -David Koudys (2-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -David Koudys (2-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -Bruce Schlickbernd (2-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -John Neal (2-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -Richard Marchetti (3-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -Bruce Schlickbernd (3-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -John Neal (4-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -David Koudys (4-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -Richard Marchetti (4-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -Scott Arthur (3-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -John Neal (2-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![We needn't have worried! (Re: Should we be concerned?) -Dave Schuler (6-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|