To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 21000
20999  |  21001
Subject: 
Re: Should we be concerned?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Mon, 2 Jun 2003 20:24:44 GMT
Viewed: 
390 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys wrote:


<snip>


[JOHN]

Hey, we have a situation in Toronto where a 10 year old girl disappeared and
the next day was found in pieces in a bag on Toronto Island--the police
wanted to take DNA samples of all previously convicted pedophiles in the area
and some wouldn't submit.

I'm a proponent of freedom and 'being redeemed', but I don't know about this
one--if you were a convicted pedophile, do you, today, have the right to not
submit to giving a DNA sample?  Especially in a case such as this?  I dunno.

More info and a petition here:

http://www.hollyslaw.com

(I think)

Dave K

Sorry' it's

http://www.hollyslaw.ca

being a Canadian thing and all...

sorry for any confusion

Dave K



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Should we be concerned?
 
(...) Hey, we have a situation in Toronto where a 10 year old girl disappeared and the next day was found in pieces in a bag on Toronto Island--the police wanted to take DNA samples of all previously convicted pedophiles in the area and some (...) (21 years ago, 2-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

36 Messages in This Thread:














Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR