Subject:
|
Re: Should we be concerned?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 2 Jun 2003 18:27:22 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
285 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd wrote:
snip
|
Conservative: Run by lawyers.
Left - Liberal: Run by lawyers.
|
Ah, now we are starting to talk about the real enema here;-)
|
Naw, thats no good. Enemas are supposed to provide at least *some* relief.
Dave!
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
36 Messages in This Thread: ![Should we be concerned? -Dave Schuler (30-May-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -Scott Costello (31-May-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -Bruce Schlickbernd (31-May-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -Richard Marchetti (1-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -Scott Costello (2-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -Richard Marchetti (2-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -Aaron West (2-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -Scott Costello (4-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -Richard Marchetti (4-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -Aaron West (4-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -Chris Phillips (4-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -Richard Marchetti (4-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -Chris Phillips (4-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Digression on Johnson (was Re: Should we be concerned?) -Richard Marchetti (4-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -Bruce Schlickbernd (4-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -Dave Schuler (4-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -Scott Costello (4-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -Bruce Schlickbernd (2-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -John Neal (2-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -Bruce Schlickbernd (2-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -John Neal (2-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -David Koudys (2-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -John Neal (2-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -David Koudys (2-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -David Koudys (2-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -Bruce Schlickbernd (2-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -John Neal (2-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -Richard Marchetti (3-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -Bruce Schlickbernd (3-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -John Neal (4-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -David Koudys (4-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -Richard Marchetti (4-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -Scott Arthur (3-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Should we be concerned? -John Neal (2-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![We needn't have worried! (Re: Should we be concerned?) -Dave Schuler (6-Jun-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|