Subject:
|
Re: LP statement on terrorist attacks
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sat, 15 Sep 2001 12:57:39 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
439 times
|
| |
|
|
> > I guess you don't know what pandering is, then... In fact maybe you
don't
> > know what you're talking about at all, with respect to this. That's
> > understandable, you're pretty close to the epicenter and can't be
expected
> > to be 100% rational.
> >
> > ++Lar
>
> Larry, you never cease to amaze me with the insults you will throw out at
> anyone who disagrees with you.
That's a mischaracterization. Read on.
Really - first you say I don't know what I'm talking about, then you say I'm
irrational. How is either one not an insult?
You don't have to agree with my opinion on what to do, or the LP's position,
but to call it pandering is just being clueless or insulting, whichever you
choose.
And now you call me clueless or insulting.
What's your beef?
Very simple LAR. Given that the LP has only a miniscule elected voice in the
political decisions of this country, their statement serves no purpose but to
promote themselves. The LP will not be making any of the numerous decisions
that will guide the future of this country. The LP holds as much political
power as a group of MacDonald's French Friers. Anyone individual can, and
should, have an opinion. I personnaly don't care what the LP thinks because
they are not in power. As they have no power, their statement serves no
purpose but self promotion.
> It is also extremely clear that you are attempting to do the same with
your
> statement "can't be expected to be 100% rational" above.
> That's right folks, don't disagree with LP (LAR that is). As usual, he
> insults anyone who disagrees with his opinion.
That in itself is insulting Ed and I expect better when you come to your
senses. I'm trying to cut you a little slack here rather than assume
malicious intent on your part.
++Lar
And yet again you insult by characterizing me as insane.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: LP statement on terrorist attacks
|
| (...) That's a mischaracterization. Read on. (...) Let's be clear here. We are, in case you hadn't noticed, having a bit of a debate about what we ought to do. Militarily, economically, from a foreign policy perspective, you name it. That debate is (...) (23 years ago, 15-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
49 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
