To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.loc.auOpen lugnet.loc.au in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Local / Australia / 2128
2127  |  2129
Subject: 
Re: A Parental Perspective on Juniorisation and Being the Strongest Brand
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.au
Date: 
Thu, 13 Jul 2000 21:16:14 GMT
Viewed: 
25 times
  
Deidre Rushton Brumby skrev i meddelandet ...

Are Lego already a household name? Probably.  Is it a good name? Not
really, unless "that hideously expensive plastic stuff" can be taken as good.

I think Lego cost a lot of money, but expensive? Almost all toys cost a lot of
money, but most of them are used for a very limited time. Lego has no limits,
you never get too old, so the 'cost per used hour' will be _very_ low for the
Lego. Also, the second-hand value of Lego is quite OK, in contrast with most
toys.

--
Anders Isaksson, Sweden
BlockCAD:  http://user.tninet.se/~hbh828t/proglego.htm
Gallery:   http://user.tninet.se/~hbh828t/gallery.htm



Message is in Reply To:
  A Parental Perspective on Juniorisation and Being the Strongest Brand
 
**Warning - this is very long! ** I haven't tacked this onto any particular thread because I've read many bits and pieces about juniorisation and being the strongest brand over a few months. I'm removing my AFOL cap and putting on my Mum hat for (...) (24 years ago, 13-Jul-00, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.au) ! 

45 Messages in This Thread:























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR