To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.dear-legoOpen lugnet.dear-lego in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Dear LEGO / 2278
2277  |  2279
Subject: 
Re: A Parental Perspective on Juniorisation and Being the Strongest Brand
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general
Date: 
Thu, 13 Jul 2000 19:30:31 GMT
Viewed: 
4436 times
  
(Removing .loc.au because it's not really Aussie-specific anymore, if it
ever was)

In lugnet.dear-lego, Will Hess writes:
> Lego may tout the fact that Duplo works with System but in my limited
> experience (my daughter and my brother who is 14 years younger than I) I
> have never seen that put into action.

Well, Todd did some great things with Duplo dinos...but I agree, there's
not much *reason* to make them work together.

> I also agree with her thoughts regarding juniorization but would like to add
> a thought to the discussion.  One of the biggest obsticales (sp?) to
> becomming the "leading brand among families with children" is that well over
> half their market is ignored at retail outlets (here in the US)...the girls.
> Look at the Lego shelf next time you're at the toy store...what is there
> that would keep girls coming back?  I know that for my part there's nothing
> there I'd want to get for my daughter.  Until Lego addresses this imbalance
> I'd say that they'll have a tough time realizing their stated goal.  They
> may have brand RECGONITION but brand LOYALTY...not likely.

I wouldn't mind seeing stuff aimed at girls that wasn't so...well...
Barbie-esque.  But that's just personal.  I find the amount of pink to be
offputting, and the suggestion that everything feminine is pink kind of
sets my teeth on edge.

My other big problem with the Scala/Belville sets is summed up best in the
words of the NLNLF when she got to that part of the catalog: "There's no
building!"  It seems like the sets specifically aimed at girls have far
fewer pieces, so you can't do as much with them.  In some ways, they miss
what I see as the 'point' of LEGO even more than the Town Jr. sets do.

I wonder how well the older System sets (which seemed to me to be a bit
more gender-neutral, with shops and houses and things rather than
policemen and firemen and construction workers) sold to girls, in
comparison to the current ones?

And on a related note, why does LEGO seem to be so reluctant to sell their
girl-targetted lines in the US?  Or is it the retailers who are reluctant
to carry them?


J



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: A Parental Perspective on Juniorisation and Being the Strongest Brand
 
(...) Agreed. Pink pieces are gross, and can't be reused in a normal town without being noticed for being recycled Barbie-esque sets. If placed next to any other colour, it looks wrong. (...) The dead Paradisa line was pretty good to build. My (...) (26 years ago, 13-Jul-00, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: A Parental Perspective on Juniorisation and Being the Strongest Brand
 
I must say that I agree 100% with Deidre's point about compatibility between Lego brands (Primo, Duplo, System). My wife and I gave some Duplo to our daughter on her first birthday. It was quite a while before she put her first pieces together but (...) (26 years ago, 13-Jul-00, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.au)

45 Messages in This Thread:























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR