| |
In article <G2L2K7.Hz2@lugnet.com>, "Tony Hafner"
<hafhead@PANTSplanetquake.com> wrote:
> But the site is basically unuseable anyway, as it is ridiculously
> slow. Not that this is a big surprise- I just wonder why they bother
> asking you if you want the "hi-band" flash site or the "lo-band" HTML
> site. Apparently "lo" is their special word for "tons of images and
> code that take forever on a P500 with a T1 connection", while "hi" is
> their special word for "sucks as bad as the lo site, but also
> includes animation on every page that has to run before the page
> becomes UI active".
I didn't notice any unreasonable slowness on the hi-band site over a
cable modem. I doubt it's the design that's causing the slowness you
had; I imagine either the server or the network was overloaded when you
visited the site.
--
Mark D. McKean - The Quantum Panda - qpanda@iwaynet.net
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
66 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
