Subject:
|
Re: 2 Things...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 23 Jun 1999 12:35:33 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
839 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Todd Lehman writes:
> In lugnet.general, James Brown writes:
> > > > 1024x768, 24 bit. Part of the issue (I've since discovered) is that
> > > > most of the time I run on an LCD, and the subtler variations are harder
> > > > to see unless I tilt my screen at a ridiculous angle.
> > >
> > > A-*ha*. OK, now I can possibly see how the link coloring might be a
> > > problem. How about the purely text links? How do they look? Is it
> > > mainly the little square box that's hard to tell with, or all links?
> >
> > The purely text are fine. It's mostly an issue with the little box.
>
> Let's try this... Let's try an old 1994 web design trick: Not setting any
> LINK= or VLINK= attributes at all in the <BODY> tag, and letting the browser
> use its defaults, whatever they may be (usually bright blue and dark
> magenta).
>
> How does it look for you now? What are the RGB values that you have set in
> your browser for links?
>
> --Todd
Thank you! Lugnet looks wonderful with my colors (works well with the
background colors, too), which I've found to work on just about every website
I've been to! ;)
Link color: R0 G128 B0 (Green)
Vlink color: R128 G64 B0 (Brownish-Orange)
Jeff
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: 2 Things...
|
| (...) Let's try this... Let's try an old 1994 web design trick: Not setting any LINK= or VLINK= attributes at all in the <BODY> tag, and letting the browser use its defaults, whatever they may be (usually bright blue and dark magenta). How does it (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jun-99, to lugnet.general)
|
54 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
