Subject:
|
Re: Divorce?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 5 Feb 2003 23:25:14 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1278 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Kirby Warden writes:
> In lugnet.general, Richard Noeckel writes:
> > > In lugnet.general, Kirby Warden writes:
> > > being childish because YOU chose all the
> > > wrong words to express this "sarcastic" vent?
> >
> > But Kirby, that’s the nature of ‘sarcasm!’
> > You choose all the “Wrong words” specifically in order to apply an inflection.
> > The “wrong words,” when properly understood, are what create the humor!
> >
> > By explaining the nuances or by being stolidly direct the whole scenario will
> > appear dull and uninteresting. Thus, by sarcastically portraying certain events,
> > the general situation will appear far more interesting/comical.
> >
> > --==Richard==--
>
>
> Sorry, i have to stick to my guns here. A very probable situation was
> described and a very realistic interaction took place between the two
> parties involved. Was he being sarcastic? If so, fine; I must've missed
> it. The only indication I have that he wasn't serious was a later post.
> Maybe he simply over-exaggerated?
I won't even answer your question. The fact is: people should not judge me
on the mere facts I posted in my story. If you don't think I was sarcastic,
that's your opinion, but nobody should have attacked me. Like I said, if
you don't like my post, ignore it.
Terry
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Divorce?
|
| (...) Sorry, i have to stick to my guns here. A very probable situation was described and a very realistic interaction took place between the two parties involved. Was he being sarcastic? If so, fine; I must've missed it. The only indication I have (...) (22 years ago, 4-Feb-03, to lugnet.general)
|
49 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
