Subject:
|
Re: Divorce?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 4 Feb 2003 00:35:15 GMT
|
Highlighted:
|
(details)
|
Viewed:
|
1266 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Richard Noeckel writes:
> > In lugnet.general, Kirby Warden writes:
> > being childish because YOU chose all the
> > wrong words to express this "sarcastic" vent?
>
> But Kirby, that’s the nature of ‘sarcasm!’
> You choose all the “Wrong words” specifically in order to apply an inflection.
> The “wrong words,” when properly understood, are what create the humor!
>
> By explaining the nuances or by being stolidly direct the whole scenario will
> appear dull and uninteresting. Thus, by sarcastically portraying certain events,
> the general situation will appear far more interesting/comical.
>
> --==Richard==--
Sorry, i have to stick to my guns here. A very probable situation was
described and a very realistic interaction took place between the two
parties involved. Was he being sarcastic? If so, fine; I must've missed
it. The only indication I have that he wasn't serious was a later post.
Maybe he simply over-exaggerated?
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Divorce?
|
| (...) I won't even answer your question. The fact is: people should not judge me on the mere facts I posted in my story. If you don't think I was sarcastic, that's your opinion, but nobody should have attacked me. Like I said, if you don't like my (...) (22 years ago, 5-Feb-03, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Divorce?
|
| (...) But Kirby, that’s the nature of ‘sarcasm!’ You choose all the “Wrong words” specifically in order to apply an inflection. The “wrong words,” when properly understood, are what create the humor! By explaining the nuances or by being stolidly (...) (22 years ago, 2-Feb-03, to lugnet.general)
|
49 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
