Subject:
|
Re: A VERY interesting article on the Lego Business
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Followup-To:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Tue, 26 Dec 2000 04:45:07 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
554 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
In lugnet.general, Lawrence Wilkes writes:
> In lugnet.general, Lawrence Wilkes writes:
> > Compelling reading for those who love lego.
> >
> > http://www.independent.co.uk/news/Business/News_Analysis/2000-12/lego201200.
> > shtml
>
> darned newsreaders
>
> http://www.independent.co.uk/news/Business/News_Analysis/2000-12/lego201200.shtml
After reading several replies to this post, I wanted to add my 2 cent
worth. My question that I will continue to ask until I can no longer, is
what will happen to all the AFOL's in 20 years? First, Lego might not be
around in twenty years. Besides the obvious, that might not seem too
terribly bad. But bricks are beginning to degrade. Almost all the Classic
Space sets I own have severe wear on them. If Lego goes out of buisness in
10 years, what will happen to the bricks 20 years later? By shear attrition
(accidental throw-aways, broken parts, losing parts indoors, etc) quite a
few would be gone after a few years. Without anything new to replace them.
The second thing I have wondered for a while, is whether AFOL's now will
still be AFOL's in twenty years. Remember, Space is only about 20 years
old, and that's roughly the same age as many other themes that created the
AFOL's of today. How will 50 year old people be able to build if their
hand-eye coordination isn't as good as it used to be? At what point do
people manditarily stop being Lego fans? It does happen at some age (80?
90?). Also, how many people on Lugnet are children? Admittedly, many
children are not allowed, or unable use the Internet. I believe the true
reason is because the new sets are not appealing enough to attract, and
hold, the average modern child's attention for years, or even months. Maybe
sets from 10 years ago could, but Lego isn't making Space Police any more.
Of course, it could just be because first-time Internet users don't know
where to find Lego sites on their own. Yes, this was a negative message,
but I hope you understand my concern over what will happen to Lego in the
future. I also hope Lego is around in the future.
|
|
Message has 2 Replies: ![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: A VERY interesting article on the Lego Business
|
| <big mother snip> Well, in twenty years I know I'll be kicking.. I'll only be 36. That seems to be around the average age here on LUGNET. As for The Lego Company, I have no doubts that they will still be around in 2020. If you are worried about your (...) (24 years ago, 26-Dec-00, to lugnet.space)
|
Message is in Reply To:
42 Messages in This Thread: ![A VERY interesting article on the Lego Business -Lawrence Wilkes (20-Dec-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: A VERY interesting article on the Lego Business -Lawrence Wilkes (20-Dec-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: A VERY interesting article on the Lego Business -Nathan McDowell (20-Dec-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: A VERY interesting article on the Lego Business -Larry Pieniazek (21-Dec-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: A VERY interesting article on the Lego Business -Bradley Dale (21-Dec-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: A VERY interesting article on the Lego Business -James Powell (21-Dec-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: A VERY interesting article on the Lego Business -Nathan McDowell (21-Dec-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: A VERY interesting article on the Lego Business -Frank Filz (21-Dec-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: A VERY interesting article on the Lego Business -Lawrence Wilkes (21-Dec-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: A VERY interesting article on the Lego Business -Tom Stangl (21-Dec-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: A VERY interesting article on the Lego Business -Richard Marchetti (22-Dec-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: A VERY interesting article on the Lego Business -Gary Istok (22-Dec-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: A VERY interesting article on the Lego Business -Lawrence Wilkes (20-Dec-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: A VERY interesting article on the Lego Business -Jon Furman (22-Dec-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: A VERY interesting article on the Lego Business -Harvey Henkelman (24-Dec-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: A VERY interesting article on the Lego Business -Gary E. Blessing (24-Dec-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: A VERY interesting article on the Lego Business -William Brumbach (26-Dec-00 to lugnet.space, lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: A VERY interesting article on the Lego Business -Paul Baulch (27-Dec-00 to lugnet.space, lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: A VERY interesting article on the Lego Business -Larry Pieniazek (27-Dec-00 to lugnet.space, lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: A VERY interesting article on the Lego Business -Paul Baulch (28-Dec-00 to lugnet.space, lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: A VERY interesting article on the Lego Business -Bryan Hodges (28-Dec-00 to lugnet.space, lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: A VERY interesting article on the Lego Business -Jonathan Mizner (28-Dec-00 to lugnet.space, lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: A VERY interesting article on the Lego Business -Greg Majewski (26-Dec-00 to lugnet.space)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Bradley has stuff to say about all this! Re: A VERY interesting article on the Lego Business -Bradley Dale (21-Dec-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Bradley has stuff to say about all this! Re: A VERY interesting article on the Lego Business -Lawrence Wilkes (21-Dec-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Radical statement! -Larry Pieniazek (21-Dec-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Radical statement! -Mark Sandlin (21-Dec-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Radical statement! -James Simpson (21-Dec-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Radical statement! -Mike Walsh (21-Dec-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Radical statement! -Steve Bliss (21-Dec-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Radical statement! -Bradley Dale (21-Dec-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Radical statement! -Larry Pieniazek (21-Dec-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Radical statement! -Ka-On Lee (22-Dec-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Bradley has stuff to say about all this! Re: A VERY interesting article on the Lego Business -Kevin Zwicker (21-Dec-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Bradley has stuff to say about all this! Re: A VERY interesting article on the Lego Business -Mike Petrucelli (21-Dec-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Bradley has stuff to say about all this! Re: A VERY interesting article on the Lego Business -Jeff Jardine (21-Dec-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: A VERY interesting article on the Lego Business -Richard Marchetti (21-Dec-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: A VERY interesting article on the Lego Business -Thomas Main (21-Dec-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: A VERY interesting article on the Lego Business -Wayne R. Hussey (21-Dec-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: A VERY interesting article on the Lego Business -Peter White (21-Dec-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: A VERY interesting article on the Lego Business -Richard Marchetti (21-Dec-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|