Subject:
|
Re: Radical statement!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 21 Dec 2000 21:26:13 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
639 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Bradley Dale writes:
>
> > Juniorization is good.
> >
> > There, I said it. Juniorization is good, *IF* it is part of a progression in
> > the product line.
> >
> > For example:
> >
> > Primo - Primo vehicles - Duplo vehicles - Duplo trains - Town Jr 4561 -
> > "craftsman" trains.
>
> 4561 is not between Duplo and "crafstman" trains
Sure it is. You're missing my point by focusing on the features and flaws of
4561. I'm not claiming that was a perfect progression or gap free, just an
example of a progression.
4561 is clearly more sophisticated of a build than a duplo train. But less
than, say, a PCC and a doodlebug, which give you somewhere the same level of
model functionality (I don't have a complete train set as a comparision at
the moment but I'm working on it)
it is also less than Metroliner, and less complex (on a per piece basis)
than the crocodile.
TLC needs progressions that stay in the same theme. There needs to be
something AFTER Town Jr.
++Lar
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Radical statement!
|
| (...) 4561 is not between Duplo and "crafstman" trains. It is part of the LEGO System Train theme, designed for children between the ages of 8 and 12. It is not a City Center set. Yes, the front of the engine is formed largely by two specialized (...) (24 years ago, 21-Dec-00, to lugnet.general)
|
42 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
