Subject:
|
Re: LEGO gaming at Gen Con?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.gaming
|
Date:
|
Tue, 25 Feb 2003 02:41:00 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
11 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.fun.gaming, Christopher L. Weeks writes:
> In lugnet.fun.gaming, Frank Filz writes:
> > James Seibert wrote:
> Great! I'm really looking forward to a full schedule of LEGO gaming. But we
> do now have to get con buy-in and figure out how we're going to be registering
> and stuff.
>
> I wonder at what point we should post an announcement to announce and events
> groups and see how many more we can draw out of the woodwork. Isn't there an
> IndyLUG or something?
A Good Idea. IndyLUG would also be a good candidate for contacting LD, as
logic dictates leftover K8 goes to the "localest" LUG.
> > question I would have though is what the feeling would be about having
> > both Pirate Wars and the Pirate Game? Would that be confusing to people?
> > With both, I think it would definitely make sense to do the campaign
> > game for the Pirate Game.
>
> It certainly makes sense to not run them against each other. But I'm not
> opposed to having both played. It might be fun to compare them that way...and
> even bill them with that ability in mind. We need to remember that we are more
> valuable to the con if we can bring more registrants.
To the same end (and just 'cause it would be fun), I'd like to run a
comparison game between Brik Wars and Lego Wars. (which I will have to
rename if I'm bringing it to something official. grr.)
James
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: LEGO gaming at Gen Con?
|
| (...) When I first approached the event coordinator, I wrote something like "we have run a number of LEGO-related events in the past...." and she took that to mean that I was a LEGO rep and responded with more detail to me than she should have. I (...) (22 years ago, 25-Feb-03, to lugnet.gaming)
|
37 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
