Subject:
|
Re: TLG investigation
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.dear-lego
|
Date:
|
Wed, 17 Feb 1999 20:56:27 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1720 times
|
| |
|
|
Okeedoke.
I'm obviously wrong about my ideas about the re-release of older sets.
I thought that there would be a group of collectors who would not want old sets to
be rereleased because it decreases the value (not necessarily monetary) of the
vintage sets.
But, since the more vocal of you seem to contradict this concept, I am beginning to
doubt whether or not this is really an issue.
Actually, if you see my original comments on this matter, you'll see that I was
personally in favour of rereleasing old sets. I just raised the question of
whether or not that would be fair to vintage set collectors. Not knowing any
people like that personally, I could only guess as to what their reaction would be.
> > Mark
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: TLG investigation
|
| (...) sets to (...) Few here are collectors first. To coin a Larry phrase "love of the brick" is the primary modivator. Scalper is the most evil name you can be called here, seconded by speculator. The more re-release sets = the better. In fact if I (...) (25 years ago, 19-Feb-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: TLG investigation
|
| (...) I agree with this attitude. And this is exactly why I see little reason for re- releasing archaic sets. Let me give an example: My 8 year-old brother and his friends seem to have similar criteria for selecting lego sets. They like new or rare (...) (25 years ago, 17-Feb-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
46 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
