Subject:
|
Re: TLG investigation
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.dear-lego
|
Date:
|
Wed, 17 Feb 1999 14:54:57 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
CJC@NEWSGUY.COMavoidspam
|
Viewed:
|
1284 times
|
| |
|
|
Mark Tarrabain <markt@lynx.bc.ca> wrote:
> > 4) Re-releasing Old Sets.
>
> This would be cool. Although it might reduce the value of existing vintage sets.
> Rereleasing in different colors doesn't seem like a particularly attractive
> solution to me, personally, so I don't know how they'd be able to please both
> sides.
Sorry if this offends but I don't think that anyone who HAS vintage
sets and honestly plans to keep them would care less if that same set
were rereleased in the exact same colors. People who have old sets
they are sitting on in hopes of selling them for a fortune are the
only people who should mind seeing those sets rereleased.
So if those are the two "sides" of the issue I'd say one of them
doesn't matter, and I think most people would agree which side that
is.
Bring back some of the old classics. I'd LOVE to see some of my
classic Castle sets reduced in value if that means I too can purchase
them in large quantities.
--
Unofficial listing of weekly US Lego Shop at Home phone specials
http://www.lugnet.com/lsahs/
800-835-4386 (S@H USA) / 800-267-5346 (S@H Canada)
www.lugnet.com/news/ - Meet more LEGO fans in your area through LUGNET
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
 | | Re: TLG investigation
|
| (...) Actually, it doesn't matter to me personally either. I was merely attempting to be sensitive to the needs of people that I would imagine are actually out there. I would have guessed, however, contrarary to what you are saying, that many people (...) (25 years ago, 17-Feb-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
| | | Re: TLG investigation
|
| I agree with Mike. When you look at the vast number of sets that have been produced over the last 41 years, what difference does a few make. I have a lot of old sets, and nothing would make me happier that to purchase more of the older sets. I (...) (25 years ago, 17-Feb-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
| | | Thank you!
|
| Mike Stanley wrote in message ... (...) vintage sets. (...) attractive (...) both (...) EXACTLY how I feel. If you buy 'em and put 'em on a shelf without even playing with them, why don't you just stockpile Furby's instead! Dave (25 years ago, 18-Feb-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: TLG investigation
|
| (...) I posted a similar suggestion on lugnet.general. I'd truly love to see it actually happen. (...) Wow... what is it that they say about "great minds"? :) (...) Uhmmm.... no comment. <weak grin> (...) This would be cool. Although it might reduce (...) (25 years ago, 16-Feb-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
46 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
