Subject:
|
Re: TLG investigation
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.dear-lego
|
Date:
|
Wed, 17 Feb 1999 19:36:31 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
lpien@%Spamcake%iwantnospam.ctp.com
|
Viewed:
|
3234 times
|
| |
|
|
Mike Stanley wrote:
> I also don't know anyone in our community who wouldn't rather give up
> the "rare" status of their favorite sets in order to have 10 more of
> them for parts purposes.
Yes!
In fact, if this were an externally measurable thing and if we ever had
a need to sort the AFOLs from the speculators, it would be a pretty good
criteria. But it's not externally measurable, and we don't have a need
to do any sorting, I don't think.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: TLG investigation
|
| (...) I guess that's the difference between someone who "collects" Lego stuff for the sake of collecting it and someone who wants to amass a collection of Lego stuff for the sake of having cool stuff, if that makes sense. My 6067 is valuable to me (...) (28 years ago, 17-Feb-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
46 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
