Subject:
|
Re: TLG investigation
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.dear-lego
|
Date:
|
Wed, 17 Feb 1999 16:03:08 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
LPIEN@IWANTNOSPAM.CTP.COMihatespam
|
Viewed:
|
1459 times
|
| |
|
|
Mark Tarrabain wrote:
> Actually, it doesn't matter to me personally either. I was merely attempting to be
> sensitive to the needs of people that I would imagine are actually out there. I would
> have guessed, however, contrarary to what you are saying, that many people with
> vintage sets value the sets *because* they cannot be obtained any more. It's not
> about making a profit, it's just about having something that not everybody else can go
> out and get themselves. I don't know any other AFOL personally, though, so I could be
> wrong.
Mark, I'm not just picking fights with you, honest. :-)
I spent close on to 800 to get my two airport shuttles. I would not be
mad, or upset or disappointed if I could all of a sudden buy more of
them for closer to the original MSRP. I'd just buy more. Why?
I've gotten my 800 worth of enjoyment out of my shuttles already. They
are gorgeous sets.
You haven't seen a lot of Monorail MOC work from me. I tend to leave
MOCs put together. But I don't use the parts from airport shuttle, OR
6990 OR 6991 them in MOCs because I don't want to disperse the parts. If
I could buy more shuttles I would, gladly, and do some MOC work. I
suppose that since I have like 4 6991s I should be doing building with
those. Probably right.
Maybe other AFOLs are more collector oriented. Maybe I am fooling
myself, because I DO brag to people that I'm 9V complete, (2x, if it
were not for one missing clubcar) Launch Command complete, airport
complete, mono complete, etc. etc. But I really really think I value the
sets highly because they are good, not because that's what it took to
get them.
I dunno. Could be all wet.
++Lar
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: TLG investigation
|
| I think a good way to handle it would be to either 1) Have a distinct number on the re-issued set (EX:6991A) or 2) Have Classic set printed on the instructions and the box, to distinguish those from the originals. That way, the original sets would (...) (25 years ago, 18-Feb-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: TLG investigation
|
| (...) Actually, it doesn't matter to me personally either. I was merely attempting to be sensitive to the needs of people that I would imagine are actually out there. I would have guessed, however, contrarary to what you are saying, that many people (...) (25 years ago, 17-Feb-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
46 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
