Subject:
|
Re: Contributor Agreement License details - updated version
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Mon, 5 Feb 2007 22:55:15 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
5189 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Anders Isaksson wrote:
> What does
> the 'license' *really* say? What does LDRAW org. *really* mean with this
> license? And why doesn't the 'license' spell that out - why do you have to
> resort to readme:s that have no legal binding? What is the hidden agenda?
> Will they find each other in the last chapter? Is the 'license' really the
> right one? Etc. etc.
> ...
hi anders,
the readme is nothing than a human readable version of the legal text (which in
the end tells us that lawyers are not human) and it is basically a copy of this:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/legalcode
we (the steerco haven't written it), we (the 2006/2007 steerco) haven't chosen
it, but we (the 2006/2007 steerco) have to deal with it. at this point I suggest
to return to the initial version to which all authors have agreed on and see
what the future might brings.
w.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
57 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
