To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldrawOpen lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / Organizations / LDraw / 3863
3862  |  3864
Subject: 
Re: Contributor Agreement License details
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
Date: 
Thu, 18 Jan 2007 11:39:15 GMT
Viewed: 
11424 times
  
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Kelly McKiernan wrote:
> In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Travis Cobbs wrote:
> > In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Timothy Gould wrote:
> > > Good point. Perhaps an additional comment like:
> > > 
> > > In order to avoid the listing of all contributing part authors it is sufficient
> > > to give credit to "the LDraw Parts Library" in Derivative Works in lieu of such
> > > a list.
> > > 
> > > As an addition to the end of the licence?
> > 
> > Maybe it's just me, but if renderings are considered derivative works, we need
> > to seriously step back and think long and hard about whether or not we are OK
> > with that.  I personally think that forcing renderings to have text on them
> > acknowledging that the parts came from the LDraw Parts Library is a serious
> > restriction, and very different from how things are now.  My understanding was
> > that the intent in switching to the CA license was to force people who
> > distributed the actual part files to be bound by it, NOT for people doing
> > renderings.  Am I mistaken that this was the original intent?
> 
> I agree, clarification on rendered images is needed. If a rendering using LDraw
> parts is a derivative work, and derivative works are required to visibly display
> credit, that's a problem. It won't show up on my renders; I don't burn "Credit:
> Photoshop Dev Team" on images I make with Photoshop, there's no reason to put it
> into LDraw-derived images.
> 
> - Kelly

There is one significant difference between LDraw and Photoshop in that you pay
for the right to use Photoshop without giving credit. That said I don't think we
need to vandalise our images to put the credit in but I'm not completely averse
to requiring an accompanying credit file to be included. Personally I would like
to see this as compulsory for commercial use of LDraw created images.

Tim



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Contributor Agreement License details
 
(...) I agree, clarification on rendered images is needed. If a rendering using LDraw parts is a derivative work, and derivative works are required to visibly display credit, that's a problem. It won't show up on my renders; I don't burn "Credit: (...) (20 years ago, 18-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

57 Messages in This Thread:






















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR