Subject:
|
Re: Contributor Agreement License details - updated version
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Mon, 5 Feb 2007 22:04:26 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4846 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Anders Isaksson wrote:
> Tim Gould wrote:
>
> > There is no way to use a typical LDraw file without the parts library
> > to render a scene.
>
> Actually there is. Anton Raves' library comes immediately to mind. Using
> that you're not using any information from the LDRAW parts, only the
> placement information in the model file. And his is not the only library of
> Lego parts in the world...
I did think of Anton Rave's library and LGEO but there aren't a lot of models
which use exclusively parts from LGEO (I have never used Anton's library). Sure
you can provide a counter-example and of course LDraw.org has no control over
renders generated entirely with either of these or BlockCAD.
What I did say was a "typical LDraw file". Now I find it hard to believe that a
"typical" file would contain no parts that are exclusive to the LDraw Parts
Library. I am arguing semantics here and unless we define "typical" in some
meaningful way the argument is really moot but likewise so is your
counter-argument.
But... I have already said that I agree that models are not neccessarily
derivative works and that I am happy to remove them from the Readme bit about
derivative works. I'm not sure what further point these limited counter examples
provide.
Tim
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
57 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
