Subject:
|
Re: Contributor Agreement License details
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Thu, 18 Jan 2007 01:38:20 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3772 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Timothy Gould wrote:
> Good point. Perhaps an additional comment like:
>
> In order to avoid the listing of all contributing part authors it is sufficient
> to give credit to "the LDraw Parts Library" in Derivative Works in lieu of such
> a list.
>
> As an addition to the end of the licence?
Maybe it's just me, but if renderings are considered derivative works, we need
to seriously step back and think long and hard about whether or not we are OK
with that. I personally think that forcing renderings to have text on them
acknowledging that the parts came from the LDraw Parts Library is a serious
restriction, and very different from how things are now. My understanding was
that the intent in switching to the CA license was to force people who
distributed the actual part files to be bound by it, NOT for people doing
renderings. Am I mistaken that this was the original intent?
Note that I see how renderings would be considered derivative works; I'm not
arguing about that. I'm just checking to see if this was intentional (which I
don't think it was). If I'm correct that it wasn't intentional, we may want to
add something to the effect that images generated using the library are free and
clear.
--Travis
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Contributor Agreement License details
|
| (...) I agree, clarification on rendered images is needed. If a rendering using LDraw parts is a derivative work, and derivative works are required to visibly display credit, that's a problem. It won't show up on my renders; I don't burn "Credit: (...) (17 years ago, 18-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Contributor Agreement License details
|
| Hi Zach, (...) Actually it is misspelt throughout the Licence but I can't be bothered to go through it. Insofar as LDraw has an official language it is Australian English. (...) Good point. Perhaps an additional comment like: In order to avoid the (...) (17 years ago, 17-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
57 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
