LDraw (www.ldraw.org) : 3908


CAD / Development / Organizations / LDraw / 3908	3907 \| 3909

Subject:	Re: Contributor Agreement License details - updated version
Newsgroups:	lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
Date:	Mon, 5 Feb 2007 22:20:37 GMT
Viewed:	4897 times

Tim Gould wrote: > I'm not sure what further point these limited counter examples > provide. They provide exactly that. *Counter examples* to your argumentation. If you don't know what to do with a counter example, that's your problem. In the mathematics world, *one* counter example is enough to make a 'proof' invalid. I invalidated your declaration > > > There is no way to use a typical LDraw file without the parts > > > library to render a scene. by giving one simple counter example. Now, how much more of your argumentation is as easily invalidated? What does the 'license' *really* say? What does LDRAW org. *really* mean with this license? And why doesn't the 'license' spell that out - why do you have to resort to readme:s that have no legal binding? What is the hidden agenda? Will they find each other in the last chapter? Is the 'license' really the right one? Etc. etc. ... -- Anders Isaksson, Sweden BlockCAD: http://web.telia.com/~u16122508/proglego.htm Gallery: http://web.telia.com/~u16122508/gallery/index.htm

Message has 2 Replies:

		Re: Contributor Agreement License details - updated version
(...) hi anders, the readme is nothing than a human readable version of the legal text (which in the end tells us that lawyers are not human) and it is basically a copy of this: (URL) (the steerco haven't written it), we (the 2006/2007 steerco) (...) (17 years ago, 5-Feb-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

		Re: Contributor Agreement License details - updated version
(...) I wouldn't bother quoting the mathematical world at me. I'm well aware of what defines a mathematical proof or disproof. But... since you seem to wish to be pedantic I said what FURTHER point does it bring. The postulate was already disproved (...) (17 years ago, 5-Feb-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Contributor Agreement License details - updated version
(...) I did think of Anton Rave's library and LGEO but there aren't a lot of models which use exclusively parts from LGEO (I have never used Anton's library). Sure you can provide a counter-example and of course LDraw.org has no control over renders (...) (17 years ago, 5-Feb-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

57 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search