To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldrawOpen lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / Organizations / LDraw / 3902
3901  |  3903
Subject: 
Re: Contributor Agreement License details - updated version
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
Date: 
Mon, 5 Feb 2007 20:53:15 GMT
Viewed: 
5475 times
  
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Timothy Gould wrote:

[snip-snap]

As I mentioned in my response to Steve changing the license (again) is a huge
job and I for one would not like to see updates delayed even more (and we're
talking at least another year I would think) in order to change something in the
_already agreed upon_ license that can be (in my opinion) adequately dealt with
outside it. I've outlined my thoughts on the costs and benefits of such a
change.

Cost of changing the license:

* Lawyers fees or time spent finding a new suitable license
* Another long delay to Parts Library releases
* A huge amount of work tracking down all part authors again and getting them to
agree to a new license

Benefits of changing the license:

* Enforcement policy can be enshrined in the license rather than the Readme
* The risk of users being targeted by LDraw.org for non-commercial violations of
the CC can be removed

As a user of LDraw I am not prepared to wait another year to see a new part
release. As a part author I am not prepared to submit parts knowing that they
will not be released for a long time because of administrative issues. As an
adminstrator of LDraw I am not prepared to put in the work to change the license
again and I would probably retract my candidacy for the upcoming SteerCo
electrions.

Tim (and once again I have to stress this is all my opinion and does not reflect
the opinions of the SteerCo in any way)


the steerco has considered the option to change the license but considering that
we weren't able to track down 18 people last time
http://news.lugnet.com/cad/?n=14080 (we are still 33 parts behind in the rewrite
http://news.lugnet.com/cad/dev/org/ldraw/?n=3783), I have no idea how much we
would lose this time. to be honest I don't care 'cos I would have to do the job
;-)

w.
(it's me, not the steerco)


ps. Chris Alano, just in case you're reading this - drop me a mail. you know
I've tried to contact you for 8 months now, have bothered your brother with
several mails. he told you you meet each other at christmas, that you were still
procrastinating ... that I should encourage you once again ... but I don't have
a working mailing address at hand ... so please, please drop me a line)



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Contributor Agreement License details - updated version
 
(...) If you are referring to the non-pursuit section of the readme it is most definitely in accord with the license. As you say a license is only as good as its enforcement but stating a policy of enforcement does not change the license. As an (...) (18 years ago, 5-Feb-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

57 Messages in This Thread:






















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR