Subject:
|
Re: Contributor Agreement License details - updated version
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Mon, 5 Feb 2007 16:11:57 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4633 times
|
| |
|
|
> In the case of a render the finished product is most definitely a
> derivative work as without the parts it could not exist. As such it
> falls most distinctly under the realms of the license.
I disagree. A sculpture may contain obvious marks from a distinctive
chisel, but is not a derivative of that chisel. Now if you make a new
chisel based on the distinctive chisel, that's a derivative work.
> As for means of transmission you are throwing up pointless and
> meaningless rubbish.
Again, I disagree. We clearly see the world through different eyes.
You can call my views rubbish if you want. That's ok, nothing will
come of it because I *already* agreed to whatever terms the Ldraw Org
came up with for it's license. I'm just trying to point out what I
see as a slight flaw in the thinking.
Have fun,
Don
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
57 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
