Subject:
|
Re: Voting Open for LCAD Parts Update 2000-01
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Mon, 24 Apr 2000 07:20:25 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1585 times
|
| |
|
|
"Steve Bliss" <blisses@worldnet.att.net> writes:
> 6041.DAT Propeller 3 Blade 1.5 Diameter
> 4617.DAT Propeller 3 Blade 5.5 Diameter
Sounds good to me!
> Here's another problem to think about: categories. Should Propeller
> and Rotor be combined? It seems redundant to have both.
I think they should be combined. We don't have that many
propellers/rotors anyway. Besides, it is probably better to put them in
the same category, as the user will spend less time searching for
individual parts.
Fredrik
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Voting Open for LCAD Parts Update 2000-01
|
| (...) Cool. I'll look at the other propellors (note LDraw-spelling) and rotors to see if their names can be adjusted to match. (...) True, but what category? The differences between propellors and rotors are small (for our purposes), but the (...) (25 years ago, 24-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Voting Open for LCAD Parts Update 2000-01
|
| (...) How about the following name-changes: 6041.DAT Propeller 3 Blade 1.5 Diameter 4617.DAT Propeller 3 Blade 5.5 Diameter The only other information morphological information would be connection-type, but I don't see a strong need for that. Here's (...) (25 years ago, 24-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
73 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
