Subject:
|
Re: Voting Open for LCAD Parts Update 2000-01
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Tue, 25 Apr 2000 15:32:32 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1646 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.cad.dev, Fredrik Glöckner wrote:
> "Steve Bliss" <blisses@worldnet.att.net> writes:
>
> > 6041.DAT Propeller 3 Blade 1.5 Diameter
> > 4617.DAT Propeller 3 Blade 5.5 Diameter
>
> On second thoughts, perhaps we should add even more info? How about
> adding "angled blade" or some info about the number of studs on the
> blades, if that applies?
Here are the current parts from the Propellor and Rotor categories:
4745.DAT Propellor 2 Blade
6040.DAT Propellor Housing
3480.DAT Rotor 2 Blade Helicopter Tail
2421.DAT Rotor 3 Blade
2479.DAT Rotor 4 Blade 5 Diameter
And the next update is going to (re-)add the following:
6041.DAT Propeller 3 Blade 1.5 Diameter
4617.DAT Propeller 3 Blade 5.5 Diameter
3461.DAT Rotor 4 Blade Helicopter
So we might reorganize to:
4745.DAT Propellor 2 Blade 2.8 Diameter Freestyle
3480.DAT Propellor 2 Blade 4 Diameter Large Hole
6041.DAT Propellor 3 Blade 3 Diameter Boat
2421.DAT Propellor 3 Blade 4 Diameter Small Hole
4617.DAT Propellor 3 Blade 5.5 Diameter Airplane
2479.DAT Propellor 4 Blade 5 Diameter Studded
3461.DAT Propellor 4 Blade 5 Diameter Studded
I added the bits on the ends to provide some evocative terminology. I'm not
sure that's the right way to go, or not.
Also, I'm not sure what to do with:
6040.DAT Propellor Housing
It doesn't exactly belong in the 'Propellor' category, but I'd hate to rename it
"Plate 2 x 2 x 2/3 with Propellor Housing". Anyone have any ideas?
> And another thing: The 6041 has a larger diameter than 1.5, right? It
> must be the radius which is 1.5?
Arrr, you're right. It should be 3.
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: | | Re: Voting Open for LCAD Parts Update 2000-01
|
| Steve Bliss <blisses@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:3dcbgs44ugldbko...4ax.com... (...) You probably didn't intend to have identical names here. (...) Wouldn't that be "Brick 2 x 2 x 2/3 w/ Propellor Housing"? The Propellor category works (...) (25 years ago, 25-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Voting Open for LCAD Parts Update 2000-01
|
| (...) On second thoughts, perhaps we should add even more info? How about adding "angled blade" or some info about the number of studs on the blades, if that applies? And another thing: The 6041 has a larger diameter than 1.5, right? It must be the (...) (25 years ago, 25-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
73 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|