Subject:
|
Re: fixed part: JW's parts
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Mon, 12 Apr 1999 23:14:20 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
CJC@NEWSGUY.COMstopspam
|
Viewed:
|
1087 times
|
| |
|
|
Earls HouseHold <brandone@mounet.com> wrote:
>
> Mike Stanley wrote in message ...
> > I'd say the bar should be set at whatever level that the majority of
> > the part authors and other longtime users think it should be set. If
> > that is an unreasonable level... well, tough.
>
>
> Mike, you "absolutely" missed the point. Everything you wrote is
> reasonable, except for the last two, but to my knowledge there is not a
> consensus on what is reasonable. If I'm to believe that all parts in the
No, I had no desire to play semantics with you and debate whether or
not any part needs to be "absolutely perfect". I never used those
words.
What I meant to make clear, and what I think anyone with two neurons
to rub together would have caught, instead of trying to pick nits with
me, is that a) the parts authors should set the standard, and by that
I mean the ESTABLISHED accomplished parts authors, b) the other
longtime users who may not be prolific parts authors ought to get some
say also, c) even if what those two groups sets as the level is
considered to be unreasonable by some (you, me, JW, whoever), that
really isn't that important.
The people who have the talent to make the parts and make them well
ought to be the ones setting the standard - period, no matter how
reasonable or unreasonable.
Now if you want to continue to pick nits with Tim and Onyx over the
literal meaning of absolutely perfect and the implied meaning that
everyone else understood, fine. You can do it alone, though.
--
Lego Shop at Home: 800-835-4386 (USA) / 800-267-5346 (Canada)
www.lugnet.com/news/ - A great new resource for LEGO fans worldwide
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: fixed part: JW's parts
|
| Mike Stanley wrote in message ... (...) Mike, you "absolutely" missed the point. Everything you wrote is reasonable, except for the last two, but to my knowledge there is not a consensus on what is reasonable. If I'm to believe that all parts in (...) (25 years ago, 12-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
43 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
