Subject:
|
Re: [ldraw.org] Shockwave Flash
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Mon, 12 Apr 1999 23:24:16 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
cjc@newsguy.com#SayNoToSpam#
|
Viewed:
|
962 times
|
| |
|
|
Sproaticus <jsproat@geocities.com> wrote:
> Tim,
>
> Please, please, please, please, please, please, please do *NOT* rely on
> Shockwave plugins to access content on the new site. IMO, this is far worse
> than image maps, because, in essence, it is forcing people to stick to one
> piece of buggy software in order to use the site. The advantage of a pretty
> face is not worth the surfers you will lose.
>
> I really really really like the idea of getting content up and accessable
> first, then making it look nice second. Priorities, man, priorities.
Ditto. As cool as Flash and Shockwave can be, they should always be
optional, with no real loss of content to those not choosing to use
them.
I love Flash, don't get me wrong. But I do recognize it as mostly
fluff when it comes to actually getting information or files.
I like Flash alot when I'm at work, where we have 6 T1's and a DS-3.
I often turn images off entirely when I'm at home, even over ISDN.
--
Lego Shop at Home: 800-835-4386 (USA) / 800-267-5346 (Canada)
www.lugnet.com/news/ - A great new resource for LEGO fans worldwide
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: [ldraw.org] Shockwave Flash
|
| Tim, Please, please, please, please, please, please, please do *NOT* rely on Shockwave plugins to access content on the new site. IMO, this is far worse than image maps, because, in essence, it is forcing people to stick to one piece of buggy (...) (26 years ago, 12-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
21 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
