Subject:
|
Re: fixed part: JW's parts
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Sat, 10 Apr 1999 15:42:09 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
956 times
|
| |
|
|
jonathan wilson wrote:
> 2.i did some checking and the roadplate parts i posted posted to
> cad.dat are most definatly not the versions i have in my parts folder.
> something is giong on with the cad.dat machinery as on the parts i
> have in mo parts folder there are definatly no missing studs.
I've had similar problems myself with cad.dat. However, I always check
to make sure that the file in cad.dat shows up the same as the one in my
models folder. I suggest that you do the same, especially before asking
which studs are missing.
> 3.i would like to propose a vote: how many people vote that parts can
> not be made without origonals. i might point out that the two parts of • mine
> that appeared in the update were not done form origonals. you know what • my
> vote would be.
I think this depends very much on the part. To make any part from
scratch, I believe you would need the part in hand to be able to see all
the details. LEGO parts often look like they have certain size details,
but upon closer examination the details are not the size you thought they
were. However, if you are adding a previously created pattern do a
different part, I can see why you might not need the part.
Please don't depend on LEGO instructions for accurate representations
of parts. The angles shown may throw off the scale, and instructions
have been known to contain errors.
--Bram
Bram Lambrecht / o o \ BramL@juno.com
-------------------oooo-----(_)-----oooo-------------------
WWW: http://www.chuh.org/Students/Bram-Lambrecht/
-----------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: fixed part: JW's parts
|
| (...) I think the problem Bram was having was related to some very odd SMTP e-mail problem -- that's the only place we saw it, other than JosephG's and BenV's problems, which were related to a buffer overflow[1]. But if there are still any problems (...) (25 years ago, 10-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: fixed part: JW's parts
|
| 1.what is wrong with my road curves? i am now making the curves with a sufficient number of segments to make them look good. (24 and 32). 2.i did some checking and the roadplate parts i posted posted to cad.dat are most definatly not the versions i (...) (25 years ago, 10-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
43 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
