Subject:
|
Re: fixed part: JW's parts
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Mon, 12 Apr 1999 17:27:06 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
922 times
|
| |
|
|
On Sat, 10 Apr 1999 12:30:14 GMT, "jonathan wilson" <wilsonj@xoommail.com>
wrote:
> also i notice that the big part authors (steve bliss,chris dee, john
> vanzwietsen etc) are staying out of this discussion. is there a reason for
> this? what do you think for the latest attempts at the parts?
I can't speak for anyone else, but I know when to duck. ;)
Seriously, I think I was one of the first to point out problems with
part-files you had submitted. At least, I was the first during a
part-voting review cycle.
As for the most-recent round of messages, they mostly happened over the
weekend, when I was offline.
I have not looked at the latest versions of your parts. Until I know the
dat-uploads are working, reviewing part via lugnet.cad.dat doesn't seem
like a worthwhile use of time.
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: fixed part: JW's parts
|
| how accurate should the raised baseplate be? it is accurate to about 2-3 LDU in most cases. also i notice that the big part authors (steve bliss,chris dee, john vanzwietsen etc) are staying out of this discussion. is there a reason for this? what do (...) (25 years ago, 10-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
43 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
