 | | panel with round windows (for 10020) updated [DAT]
|
|
Hi all, I updated he Santa Fe windows. It now has the silver (LDrwa chrome) and black borders. They are a bit out of proportion but it looks beautilful. Look at (URL) Panel 1 x 2 x 2 with round window v2 (needs work) 0 ROTATION CENTER 0 22 10 0 (...) (23 years ago, 9-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts as volumes (instead of surfaces)
|
|
If you're interested, take a look at my old Rayshade libraries that made the bricks from scratch using CSG. I'm especially fond of the L3G0 40-tooth technic gear. I've thought it would be nice to have "bounding boxes" for the bricks, for collision (...) (23 years ago, 9-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | avi pov animation clockworks
|
|
Hi, This is a low res/quality animation of my clockwork (URL) (23 years ago, 9-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.announce.moc)
|
| |
| | Re: GPF on manual zoom in MLCad 2.11
|
|
(...) For those that can't download just yet, the zoom is a relatively easy fix to prevent the GPF! Simply click on a piece BEFORE you do any zoom! From what I gathered, the entire model isn't referenced before the zoom takes effect, thus, an (...) (23 years ago, 9-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: [Parts Tracker] More BFC Primitives
|
|
Maybe I'm more confused now, or less who knows. But I don't think I made what I was trying to say clear in that last post. So here I am replying to myself... :) (...) That last sentance doesn't really get across what I was trying to say I think. (...) (23 years ago, 9-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: [Parts Tracker] More BFC Primitives
|
|
Steve Bliss wrote: > In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Kyle McDonald wrote: > [snip more] > > You understand the usage correctly. Except there's no special tie > between a 'mirroring' subfile reference and the INVERTNEXT command. > Authors won't (...) (23 years ago, 9-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Track Designer Registry
|
|
(...) You mean your basement is actually visible now??????? Heck, I thought your house was just built on LEGO boxes 8?) ROSCO (23 years ago, 8-Apr-02, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.cad, lugnet.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Aluminum 2x4 bricks
|
|
(...) I did some measurements a little over a year ago. I didn't write it up as well as the "long wall" post referenced by Larry, but here you go: (URL) also that I didn't measure temperature (it was "room temperature" or so), nor did I look into (...) (23 years ago, 8-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: problem with BMP to dat ldraw add on
|
|
Hello! (...) <shameless plug> Or just try the BMP2Dat32 converter from my website ;) supporting all colors and different image formats. (URL) well Carsten (23 years ago, 8-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Track Designer Registry
|
|
(...) Apparently you've seen my basement! (23 years ago, 8-Apr-02, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts as volumes (instead of surfaces)
|
|
(...) Wow, good questions. We know that some collision detection is already practical - Eric Olsen demonstrated that over a year ago. But decomposing LDraw parts into convex objects, that would be a trick. Each external box 5 (or pair of box 5's) (...) (23 years ago, 8-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: request for modification (Tracker)
|
|
(...) Wow. Good ideas. Unfortunately, for now, I'll have to file them in with all the other improvements I want to make on PT. There are a few key changes that need to occur before many other things can happen. Steve (23 years ago, 8-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: [Parts Tracker] More BFC Primitives
|
|
(...) That's weird - I know I answered your email. No big deal. (...) files already having been done by you and Damien), you're going to work on the rest of the boxes. Anyone else want to help? (...) You *can't* post new versions of official files. (...) (23 years ago, 8-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: [Parts Tracker] More BFC Primitives
|
|
(...) [snip] OK, sounds reasonable to me. (...) Yes. (...) [snip more] You understand the usage correctly. Except there's no special tie between a 'mirroring' subfile reference and the INVERTNEXT command. Authors won't explicitly use one to 'undo' (...) (23 years ago, 8-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Numbers Report
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Damien Guichard wrote: [snipped a lot of great comments about using different pages on the PT] I totally agree with everything Damien wrote, except that if one only pays attention to the Activity page, older files may (...) (23 years ago, 8-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: problem with BMP to dat ldraw add on
|
|
(...) OOoooo, going to the wayback machine for this one. Seems like LDAO's BMP2DAT does a lousy job of mapping RGB colors to LDraw colors. And it doesn't support the extended colors (17-22, 25, etc) at all. Did you reduce the bitmap to 16 colors (...) (23 years ago, 8-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Track Designer Registry
|
|
(...) Heh. If it's on floppy, it might very well be lost by now... Steve (23 years ago, 8-Apr-02, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: do these parts exist in dat form?
|
|
(...) Wow, wow, wow. Rereading the original post, it is from Jonathan! You did them yourself! shurely shome mishtake? Jeroen (confused) (23 years ago, 8-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: do these parts exist in dat form?
|
|
(...) called x500 and it's in an MPD file: (URL)2.this decorated tile: (...) 3039p01.dat (see: (URL) ) Jeroen (23 years ago, 8-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | do these parts exist in dat form?
|
|
If so, where do I get them? 1.the part that comes in a lot of 4.5v and 12v train sets thats used as a cylinder piece for steam engines. There is also a connecting rod piece that fits into it and connects to a 12v motor. I need the cylinder piece (...) (23 years ago, 8-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Track Designer Registry
|
|
(...) Yes, but in fact the project had already languished for a year, and both Leonardo and Matt admitted being too busy to work on it. New babies, dot com hours, and real life in general can be very distracting. It seemed to me that an opportunity (...) (23 years ago, 8-Apr-02, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: GPF on manual zoom in MLCad 2.11
|
|
(...) Was that a serious question? Given the number of different things on this laptop (Apache AND IIS, WebSphere AND WebLogic, MQSeries, Oracle AND SQLServer, etc. etc.) my policy on software is only upgrade when you have to. Don't dump something (...) (23 years ago, 8-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: Does anyone have the .DAT files of Datsville Petrolium?
|
|
I have it, but inlined into one single .dat file. I also should have the original files.... somewhere... :o/ If you're interested, just LMK. /Tore (...) (23 years ago, 8-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: GPF on manual zoom in MLCad 2.11
|
|
This bug is fixed in V2.12. There was a packaging problem at the beginning of V2.12 but that is also fixed now. So ... go on and download the latest version please! Michael "Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message (...) (23 years ago, 8-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Does anyone have the .DAT files of Datsville Petrolium?
|
|
I lost all my dat files in a recent hard disk crash and this is one of the few items I havent been able to find anywhere else. I need to get back the .dat file of the version that has been displayed at e.g. ldraw.org MOTM and at kidvention (i.e. (...) (23 years ago, 8-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Track Designer Registry
|
|
(...) Weelll... DO you have the source, in case Matt can't find it? (don't laugh, I lost some source to a project I worked years on... it's not so much LOST as it is on one of several hundred floppies but not sure WHICH one)... (23 years ago, 8-Apr-02, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Another Bug...
|
|
(...) Yes, I did. It was that packeging error-whatever that was. And I've used GS SPlit to split all the files I need. Only problem is that pov-ray is slow on that computer.(of coarse) John Kruer (23 years ago, 8-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: Track Designer Registry
|
|
(...) Matt would need a least a week to sort things out, so I wasn't worried at that stage. (...) That is correct, I thought that Matt may have said that he had found it by now, and given it to someone. I didn't expect him to set up a sourceforge (...) (23 years ago, 7-Apr-02, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Aluminum 2x4 bricks
|
|
Bram Lambrecht <bram@cwru.edu> wrote in message news:Gu48ow.BJC@lugnet.com... (...) few (...) are a (...) brick to (...) calipers (...) already (...) much (...) brick (...) If your serrious.... I'll take an aluminum one and a brass one. I don't (...) (23 years ago, 7-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Numbers Report
|
|
(...) I think Bernd and Sascha are brothers. Part authors keep LDraw alive. Steve B. has a quite expeditive (if not bureaucratic) response to your legitimate expectings. My advise is: visit the "activity" PT page rather than the "certication" or (...) (23 years ago, 7-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Track Designer Registry
|
|
(...) Well, he was waiting.. but now perhaps he's wondering whether the necessary first step is going to happen or not? That step is Matt (or whoever?) finding the code, right, not setting up the SourceForge project. But you still could do that (...) (23 years ago, 7-Apr-02, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Track Designer Registry
|
|
(...) Huh? I could swear that just a few weeks ago you recommended waiting around patiently for something to happen. (URL) decided to take your advice. Perhaps everyone else did too. ;) Don (23 years ago, 7-Apr-02, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts as volumes (instead of surfaces)
|
|
(...) Constructive Solid Geometry? (the notion of modeling solids as constructions of simpler solids, using union and intersection as operator) (23 years ago, 7-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts as volumes (instead of surfaces)
|
|
[ XFUT lugnet.cad.dev ] (...) What's "CSG descriptions"? (...) But they aren't (as you also write). Still, you are probably correct that BFC information in the LDraw parts can be used for collision detection. (...) I think it deserves further (...) (23 years ago, 7-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Track Designer Registry
|
|
It has been a few weeks now since the subject of track designer updates was brought up, has anything come out of it yet? Has anybody heard anything new from Matt about releasing the source code to individuals, sourceforge or whatever? Martin (23 years ago, 7-Apr-02, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | problem with BMP to dat ldraw add on
|
|
hey! i have a problem with ldraw addons bmp to dat plugin. it renders the dat file with all black quads. i tried with different colors still does same (23 years ago, 7-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Parts as volumes (instead of surfaces)
|
|
It has been said that, with ldraw parts, we have the geometry of TLG bricks. This is rather optimistic. Because geometry would be CSG descriptions that allow much more (although slower) than quads and triangles. CSG descriptions allow part collision (...) (23 years ago, 6-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Hidden male connectors (studs)
|
|
Hello LCD "community", As female connectors (mainly stud inlets) can effectively hide male connectors (mainly studs), we should ensure that the LCD project do not waste such an opportunity to further speed up LDraw display. I think this possibility (...) (23 years ago, 6-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.lcd)
|
| |
| | Re: 32087.dat - Train Track Cross
|
|
(...) Thanks for the reply, but i'm no parts GOD at all ;-) ,if anyone's interested, the .dat files are posted to the parts tracker. I hope there aren't too many errors in it. For the curved track and points, you'll have to get a lot off patience. I (...) (23 years ago, 6-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Beta testers needed
|
|
Thanks, Daniel Crichton contacted me requesting information for ldraw.org so I think it will be available assoon the release version is ready (or maybe the beta to). (...) (23 years ago, 6-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Beta testers needed
|
|
A general animation group would be very nice, especaliy for pov-ray issues. I for one know very little of pov-ray (that's the reason I started work on the program, to better control animation from outside pov-ray :) ) (...) (23 years ago, 6-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Beta testers needed
|
|
The animation (and export) part will work at 233, but I am afread the preview will be very, very, very slow if it works at all. But I am still tweaking it, so who knows :) (...) (23 years ago, 6-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Beta testers needed
|
|
Thanks for the feedback, I am going to try to get the application ready for betatesting before 20 April. Mainproblem is I have so many idees I don't think I can put it al in the first version, if I ever want to release it :) I will begin (...) (23 years ago, 6-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Aluminum 2x4 bricks
|
|
(...) Indeed! Also remember plates may be different too - (URL) (23 years ago, 6-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: [Parts Tracker] More BFC Primitives
|
|
Hello, Comments below... Travis Cobbs wrote: > In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Steve Bliss writes: > >>In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Tony Hafner writes: >> >>>In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Steve Bliss writes: >>> >>>>>Um... Not to stir the pot or (...) (23 years ago, 6-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Another Bug...
|
|
<snip> (...) OS stands for Operating System like WIndows 95, Windows 98, etc... In any case did you finally get it to work on the 95 machine? -Ahui (23 years ago, 6-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: [Parts Tracker] More BFC Primitives
|
|
(...) Given the fact that they have to check whether or not a given file has been mirrored, I can't see that the directionality would make a large difference. If everything used CCW, then only mirrored ones would need to be reordered (assuming the (...) (23 years ago, 6-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Another Bug...
|
|
(...) Thanks! You're right. Mine was downloaded at 8:45 in the morning on March 2. I got the old one. However, it (the older verision) worked perfectly fine on this (internet, win 98) computor. Maybe its the opperating system? My other one was a 95 (...) (23 years ago, 6-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: Another Bug...
|
|
Hello John, there has been two 2.12 versions of ML-Cad. The first one was up only for a few hours and crashed for unknown reason. Maybe you caught that version. Try to re-download ML-Cad from the ML-Cad homepage and make sure it's really (...) (23 years ago, 6-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: [Parts Tracker] More BFC Primitives
|
|
(...) Hey- but I never heard back about which ones you wanted me to work on. Should I do all the rings? That would solve this: (URL) the PT says to send new versions of existing official files to you instead of posting them directly. Should I (...) (23 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: request for modification (Tracker)
|
|
(...) Great idea- how about color-coding the voting codes? A green "C" (or "A" if you are Steve) tells you that you've already voted. Likewise, a red "H" and yellow "N" tells you that you've Held or No-voted on the part. Votes by others all show as (...) (23 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Another Bug...
|
|
(...) Tried the files... had none, but MlCad still crashed after I got them on the system. What are OS files?( I'm only twelve, and I don't have experience in many things) I had version 2.12. Also, my MlCad exe is 1.06 megabytes, more than yours. (...) (23 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | request for modification (Tracker)
|
|
Steve, I just thought of something that would be a "nice to have" feature, a modification to the Certification List page. If a person is "logged in", it would be nice if the Tracker's Certification List were to take this into account. That is, if a (...) (23 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Aluminum 2x4 bricks
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Larry Pieniazek writes: <snip> Here is the actual measurement post: (URL) interesting result! (23 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Aluminum 2x4 bricks
|
|
(...) Snippit from the FAQ: (URL) Robert Mufano: Brick height 9.582 mm 0.37724 in Plate height 3.194 mm 0.12575 in Stud pitch 7.985 mm 0.31437 in The following popular approximations are often used. Note that the Imperial approximations are each (...) (23 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Aluminum 2x4 bricks
|
|
(...) Someone, long ago, posted measurements they took which have a better basis for accuracy in my view. The memory is hazy but I think what they did was build a very long wall, ensured it was linear, and measured stud center to stud center across (...) (23 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Aluminum 2x4 bricks
|
|
(...) Yeah, I know. My brain slipped into "helpful" mode before I finished reading and thinking... :-P (...) Thus demonstrating the "real world" difference between a scientist and an engineer. Good luck, and keep us informed, OK? (And, what do you (...) (23 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | RE: Aluminum 2x4 bricks
|
|
(...) Those are the dimensions I did use, Franklin :) However, those dimensions are NOT accurate to .001 inch. And that discrepancy apparently makes a significant difference in the connection properties of the part. --Bram Bram Lambrecht (...) (23 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Aluminum 2x4 bricks
|
|
(...) These are cool as Bram! Aluminium would be cool too ;) Now all you have to do is make the classic minifig! The one we all love and know. Then contact me once you have mastered this :) Mel (...) (23 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Aluminum 2x4 bricks
|
|
(...) Which is my round-about way of saying, "Your figures/calculations look OK to me"... :-/ No idea why it isn't working for you. Sorry... Franklin (23 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Aluminum 2x4 bricks
|
|
(...) Bram, The metric I use is 1 LDU = 1/64". Here's how I derived it. The classic 2x4 brick is one and a quarter inches long (1.25") and is 80 LDU long. Thus, 80 LDU = 1.25" = 5/4". Dividing both sides by 80 gives 1 LDU = 5/320" = 1/64". Hope this (...) (23 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Aluminum 2x4 bricks
|
|
[Please set the follow-up to the appropriate group] I'm currently taking a CNC class at school, so for a little side project I machined a couple 2x4 bricks out of aluminum on the EMCO PC 50 machines we have. Since I wanted to use a 1/8" flat end (...) (23 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Hi!
|
|
Richard, Have you gotten a user-ID for the Parts Tracker (at LDraw.org), yet? Once you've got an ID and password (ask Steve Bliss, the admin for the Tracker), you can post reviews of the new, prospective parts, or even post your own new parts files! (...) (23 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Big Messy Wet Kiss!
|
|
Hey Y'all: I got into LCAD during the last 8 months or so and I have actually found it to be ABSOLUTELY INCREDIBLE!!! This post is just my small way of thanking all the people that have contributed to this massive enterprise in some way or another. (...) (23 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Fixed New Part: x194.dat ( formerly known as: x192.dat - Minifig Shield Round)
|
|
(...) I'd've just made the entire 'flat' surface of the shield's front from a single 4-4disc.dat. (...) MLCad (or maybe Word) decided to use scientific notation for some very small numbers. For example, "1.29e-005" = 0.0000129, which you probably (...) (23 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Fixed New Part: x194.dat ( formerly known as: x192.dat - Minifig Shield Round)
|
|
(...) Dude -- it SO rocks! A cajillion thanks! I get closer and closer to a CAD Gherkin...all I need now are those new Alpha Team mecha arms (with ball hinges and technic style pins) and their 2x2x2 female socket counterpart bricks. Anyone working (...) (23 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Numbers Report
|
|
(...) [*SPLUTTER*!] [*COUGH*!] [*CHOKE*!] [*GASP*!] My.... *heart*!.... [**THUD**!!!] (...) Ummmm.... ("(URL) think they're the same person. Franklin (23 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Fixed New Part: x194.dat ( formerly known as: x192.dat - Minifig Shield Round) [DAT]
|
|
here is the fixed and I hope unwrapped version of the minifig shield round. please notice that due to a request from ldraw.org the part number has changed from x192.dat to x194.dat I substituted the inlined stud with the stud2.dat primitive. (...) (23 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: does PT FAQ cover "CMDLINE"?...
|
|
Huzzah! (23 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: [Parts Tracker] More BFC Primitives
|
|
(...) I don't think that it matters either. My Naval Nuclear Power eye for detail kicked in and I felt compelled to comment. -Orion (23 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: [Parts Tracker] More BFC Primitives
|
|
(...) The ring primitives are being worked on, I believe. Steve (23 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: [Parts Tracker] More BFC Primitives
|
|
(...) Hi Steve, May be I have missed something, but I need "RingX.dat" BFC-ed primitives, otherwise I can not review these studs: p/stud2 p/stud2a p/stud4 p/stud4a p/studp01 p/stu2p01 Damien (23 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Numbers Report
|
|
(...) I don't feel so bad that so many of your parts are waiting for admin review. ;) (...) Yeah, but those files are split between Bernd and Sascha. Who I'm *assuming* are different people. Steve (23 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: [Parts Tracker] More BFC Primitives
|
|
(...) (URL) (...) I think the only way it would matter for performance is if we decided that the *entire* library would be CW or CCW, and so rendering programs wouldn't have to check the winding direction at all. And that would be a very small (...) (23 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: [Parts Tracker] More BFC Primitives
|
|
(...) For starters, I recently tried to track down the BFC specification but couldn't find it (on ldraw.org or on Steve's site). Could someone post the link please? (...) If it doesn't matter from a performance perspective, I vote you kill the (...) (23 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: does PT FAQ cover "CMDLINE"?...
|
|
(...) Thanks! I added your writeup to the PT FAQ. Let me know if everything's OK or not. (URL) Steve (23 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Numbers Report
|
|
(...) Heh. That's not quite so far from the truth... :-/ "(URL) 117 file(s) Although this guy's giving me a run for the money. ;-) (And doing some *incredible* work, to boot!!) (URL) 72 file(s) (23 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Numbers Report
|
|
(...) Well, once things settle down a bit, we'll do a release. Right now, I'm scared to check how many certified files actually are associated with non-certified files (and so would need to be held back from a release -- that's extra work for me to (...) (23 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | does PT FAQ cover "CMDLINE"?...
|
|
I've had several people ask me about the CMDLINE meta-statement. Shouldn't this meta-statement be covered in the FAQ for the Parts Tracker? (...) The CMDLINE meta-statement is a way of permitting the author to *document* certain run-time commands (...) (23 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Numbers Report
|
|
(...) Well, with the current huge number of files on the Parts Tracker, my browser is taking anywhere from 30 seconds to *two minutes* to load either the "Parts List" page or the "Certification List" page, so I'm *definitely* in favor of making a (...) (23 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Mac OS X - LdGLite Launcher .8
|
|
I have updated LdGLite Launcher to .81. New features: It remembers the last file you opened. There is a window showing a list of LEdit keys (for ease). New URL: (URL) whole point of this is to make it as easy to use as possible. LMKWYT. James (...) (23 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac)
|
| |
| | Re: Numbers Report
|
|
(...) That's pretty much what I'm planning. I'm just not sure whether to plow ahead and finish BFC'ing *all* the primitives, or stick with what's already been submitted. :) Steve (23 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: rotary dumper working on
|
|
(...) WOW! I now know how I'll be able to make a non-operating one. Josh (23 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Numbers Report
|
|
"(URL) (473 files) Subparts (133 files) Primitives (85 files) 48-Segment Primitives (23 files) "(URL) certified files. 37 file(s) need admin review. 206 file(s) need more votes. 325 files have uncertified subfiles. 91 held files. Total: 714 OK, now (...) (23 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Beta testers needed
|
|
Roland, I would be interested... BTW, is it time to consider petitioning the LUGNet Powers That Be for a new subgroup under ".cad" for this subject, i.e. ".cad.animation"?... Franklin (23 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Beta testers needed
|
|
(...) That would be cool to test, but i only have a 233Mhz Amd k6 :( (23 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: [Parts Tracker] More BFC Primitives
|
|
(...) There was some discussion whether one winding was better or not. Not limited to primitives, just in general. I think I arbitrarily put in the clause about all primitives being CCW, mostly to promote consistency, but also partly to see if it (...) (23 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Beta testers needed
|
|
I'm interested! Anders Isaksson (Delphi programmer, both work and hobby) BlockCAD: (2 URLs) (23 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: x192.dat - Minifig Shield Round
|
|
Willy: Might you post a "cleaner" version of this file? Without the wrapping lines... Thanks, Hop-Frog (23 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Beta testers needed
|
|
I am very interested in this program, since I'm stuck with my own project. /Tore (...) (23 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | rotary dumper working on
|
|
Hello, i am working on a rotary dumper for the woodchip car i made, cad screenshots are (URL) <~ there tell me what you all think (23 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Beta testers needed
|
|
(...) This is a 'god-sent' program... It's going to greatly advance the number of animators we have... Keep up the good work. Have you talked to Tim C. from ldraw.org to make a new page for you under the 3rd party ldraw applications. THIS ONE IS A (...) (23 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: [Parts Tracker] More BFC Primitives
|
|
(...) Um... Not to stir the pot or anything but I was reading the BFC proposal on your website and noticed that the BFC specification says that all primitves must be certified CCW. Did this get revised via discussion and not updated? -Orion (23 years ago, 4-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Beta testers needed
|
|
Wow ! Looks impressive. I'd be interested in testing for you : ) rmelkert <rmelkert@_remove_chello.nl> wrote in message news:3CACEFE2.302010...ello.nl... (...) application. (...) (23 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Beta testers needed
|
|
I placed a screenshot on my website to illustrate the concept of the application. (URL) (23 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Beta testers needed
|
|
Hi all, I am working on a ldraw tool for creating animations (Windows). It's called ld4dmodeler (LDraw 4Dimensional Modeler). I am working on it for over a month now and it's nearly useable but I would like to test it on different systems before (...) (23 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | [Parts Tracker] More BFC Primitives
|
|
I've submitted BFC'ed versions of all the official stu*.dat files. Surprisingly, a fair number of files are still in certified status. I expected nearly everything to drop back to "uncertified subfiles". Apparently, we don't depend on studs as much (...) (23 years ago, 4-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: [LCAD admin] plz re-name files...
|
|
(...) Done. But because of length limitations, I had to remove the word "Danger" from both titles. The keywords look fine to me. Steve (23 years ago, 4-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Part naming question for different versions of the same part
|
|
(...) I'd go for either option #1 or #3. In option #2, it seems like the name for 4066b.dat is misleading, because the difference between the parts is (relatively) minor. And I'd actually lean toward #3, because the difference is in the (...) (23 years ago, 4-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: x192.dat - Minifig Shield Round
|
|
(...) Hmm. That would look a little weird, to have LEGO floating slightly above the surface. It wouldn't *really* be noticeable, but still... I'd be inclined to ignore the slight indentation, and model the part as if the inside was the same height (...) (23 years ago, 4-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
