To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldrawOpen lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / Organizations / LDraw / 1907
1906  |  1908
Subject: 
Re: [Parts Tracker] More BFC Primitives
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
Date: 
Fri, 5 Apr 2002 18:54:48 GMT
Viewed: 
442 times
  
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Tony Hafner writes:
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Steve Bliss writes:
Um... Not to stir the pot or anything but I was reading the BFC proposal on
your website and noticed that the BFC specification says that all primitves
must be certified CCW.  Did this get revised via discussion and not updated?

For starters, I recently tried to track down the BFC specification but
couldn't find it (on ldraw.org or on Steve's site).  Could someone post the
link please?

<http://www.geocities.com/partsref/bfc/>

At this point, I'm as inclined to delete the clause from the spec as to
keep it (and modify the primitives specified as CW).

If it doesn't matter from a performance perspective, I vote you kill the
clause.

I think the only way it would matter for performance is if we decided that
the *entire* library would be CW or CCW, and so rendering programs wouldn't
have to check the winding direction at all.  And that would be a very small
difference in speed.

Steve



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: [Parts Tracker] More BFC Primitives
 
(...) I don't think that it matters either. My Naval Nuclear Power eye for detail kicked in and I felt compelled to comment. -Orion (23 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
  Re: [Parts Tracker] More BFC Primitives
 
(...) Given the fact that they have to check whether or not a given file has been mirrored, I can't see that the directionality would make a large difference. If everything used CCW, then only mirrored ones would need to be reordered (assuming the (...) (23 years ago, 6-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: [Parts Tracker] More BFC Primitives
 
(...) For starters, I recently tried to track down the BFC specification but couldn't find it (on ldraw.org or on Steve's site). Could someone post the link please? (...) If it doesn't matter from a performance perspective, I vote you kill the (...) (23 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

21 Messages in This Thread:





Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR