To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldrawOpen lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / Organizations / LDraw / 1939
1938  |  1940
Subject: 
Re: [Parts Tracker] More BFC Primitives
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
Date: 
Thu, 11 Apr 2002 21:35:03 GMT
Viewed: 
612 times
  
Hi Travis,

Travis Cobbs wrote:


Despite being the author of a rendering program, I agree with this
whole-heartedly.  Each rendering program only has to get it right once,
during the initial coding.  If we make it easier for the program, but harder
for part authors, the part authors have to get it right for every single
part made.  In addition to that, there are likely more part authors than
rendering program authors, so more people have to be educated.

Based on Kyle's comments, I think he believes that his proposed change would
have a minimal impact on part authors.  This may or may not be the case; not
being a part author, I don't feel myself qualified to judge.  However, it
sounds like Steve (who is a part author) feels it would make part authoring
more difficult.


Well I don't know that I thought it would be 'minimal' effort. I'll
bet it would be a lot of work for parts that are already done. I
did think that it wouldn't be that bad for new parts, because I
figured the author knows best what he/she want when he writes the
line in the part file. But as I'm not a parts author either, I
could very well be wrong there.

I aggree that we should make life easy for the parts authors. We
need as many parts as we can get ;) It's just my in my nature to
try to (as much as possible) compute things once and save the result
instead of computing the same thing over and over.



Did anyone look at the pseudo code I sent in one message?
See any errors in my logic??

-Kyle


--Travis Cobbs (tcobbs@REMOVE.halibut.com)



--
                                    _
-------------------------------ooO( )Ooo-------------------------------
Kyle J. McDonald                 (o o)
                                  |||||

                                  \\\//
                                  (o o)            kmcdonald@BigFoot.COM
-------------------------------ooO(_)Ooo-------------------------------



Message has 1 Reply:
  Implicit face winding (was: [Parts Tracker] More BFC Primitives)
 
(...) I recently went over some old primitives and brought them up to BFC certification. I found it very handy to have the flexibility of doing it whichever way had more "correct" surfaces. It wouldn't be so bad if Notepad had the ability to reverse (...) (23 years ago, 12-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: [Parts Tracker] More BFC Primitives
 
(...) Despite being the author of a rendering program, I agree with this whole-heartedly. Each rendering program only has to get it right once, during the initial coding. If we make it easier for the program, but harder for part authors, the part (...) (23 years ago, 11-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

21 Messages in This Thread:





Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR