Subject:
|
Re: [Parts Tracker] More BFC Primitives
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Fri, 5 Apr 2002 15:34:16 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
391 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Orion wrote:
> Um... Not to stir the pot or anything but I was reading the BFC proposal on
> your website and noticed that the BFC specification says that all primitves
> must be certified CCW. Did this get revised via discussion and not updated?
There was some discussion whether one winding was better or not. Not
limited to primitives, just in general.
I think I arbitrarily put in the clause about all primitives being CCW,
mostly to promote consistency, but also partly to see if it caused any
reaction. It's possible you are the first person to comment on it. In
a couple of years, at least.
At this point, I'm as inclined to delete the clause from the spec as to
keep it (and modify the primitives specified as CW).
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: [Parts Tracker] More BFC Primitives
|
| (...) For starters, I recently tried to track down the BFC specification but couldn't find it (on ldraw.org or on Steve's site). Could someone post the link please? (...) If it doesn't matter from a performance perspective, I vote you kill the (...) (23 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: [Parts Tracker] More BFC Primitives
|
| (...) Um... Not to stir the pot or anything but I was reading the BFC proposal on your website and noticed that the BFC specification says that all primitves must be certified CCW. Did this get revised via discussion and not updated? -Orion (23 years ago, 4-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
21 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
