Subject:
|
Re: [Parts Tracker] More BFC Primitives
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Thu, 4 Apr 2002 21:23:39 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
372 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Steve Bliss writes:
> I've submitted BFC'ed versions of all the official stu*.dat files.
>
> Surprisingly, a fair number of files are still in certified status. I
> expected nearly everything to drop back to "uncertified subfiles".
> Apparently, we don't depend on studs as much as we thought.
>
> Tony Hafner has volunteered to work on some of the other primitives, so I
> hope to have more files posted relatively soon.
>
> Steve
Um... Not to stir the pot or anything but I was reading the BFC proposal on
your website and noticed that the BFC specification says that all primitves
must be certified CCW. Did this get revised via discussion and not updated?
-Orion
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: [Parts Tracker] More BFC Primitives
|
| (...) There was some discussion whether one winding was better or not. Not limited to primitives, just in general. I think I arbitrarily put in the clause about all primitives being CCW, mostly to promote consistency, but also partly to see if it (...) (23 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | [Parts Tracker] More BFC Primitives
|
| I've submitted BFC'ed versions of all the official stu*.dat files. Surprisingly, a fair number of files are still in certified status. I expected nearly everything to drop back to "uncertified subfiles". Apparently, we don't depend on studs as much (...) (23 years ago, 4-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
21 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
