Subject:
|
Re: [Parts Tracker] More BFC Primitives
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Fri, 5 Apr 2002 23:59:27 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
347 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Steve Bliss writes:
> I've submitted BFC'ed versions of all the official stu*.dat files.
>
> Surprisingly, a fair number of files are still in certified status. I
> expected nearly everything to drop back to "uncertified subfiles".
> Apparently, we don't depend on studs as much as we thought.
>
> Tony Hafner has volunteered to work on some of the other primitives, so I
> hope to have more files posted relatively soon.
Hey- but I never heard back about which ones you wanted me to work on.
Should I do all the rings? That would solve this:
http://news.lugnet.com/cad/dev/org/ldraw/?n=1910
Anyway, the PT says to send new versions of existing official files to you
instead of posting them directly. Should I continue doing that, or should I
barge ahead and post them myself?
--
Tony Hafner
www.hafhead.com
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: [Parts Tracker] More BFC Primitives
|
| (...) That's weird - I know I answered your email. No big deal. (...) files already having been done by you and Damien), you're going to work on the rest of the boxes. Anyone else want to help? (...) You *can't* post new versions of official files. (...) (23 years ago, 8-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | [Parts Tracker] More BFC Primitives
|
| I've submitted BFC'ed versions of all the official stu*.dat files. Surprisingly, a fair number of files are still in certified status. I expected nearly everything to drop back to "uncertified subfiles". Apparently, we don't depend on studs as much (...) (23 years ago, 4-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
21 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
