Subject:
|
Re: Track Designer Registry
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains, lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Mon, 8 Apr 2002 13:26:38 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3578 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.trains, Martin Scragg writes:
> In lugnet.trains, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > In lugnet.trains, Don Heyse writes:
> > > In lugnet.trains, Martin Scragg writes:
> > > > It has been a few weeks now since the subject of track designer updates was
> > > > brought up, has anything come out of it yet? Has anybody heard anything new
> > > > from Matt about releasing the source code to individuals, sourceforge or
> > > > whatever?
> > >
> > > Huh? I could swear that just a few weeks ago you recommended waiting
> > > around patiently for something to happen.
> > > http://news.lugnet.com/trains/?n=15766
> Well the thread had only been quite for a day or two, and I figured that
> Matt would need a least a week to sort things out, so I wasn't worried at
> that stage.
Yes, but in fact the project had already languished for a year,
and both Leonardo and Matt admitted being too busy to work on it.
New babies, dot com hours, and real life in general can be very
distracting. It seemed to me that an opportunity had appeared
and was just as quickly disappearing. I've seen it happen before.
That's why I tried to move it along with a bit of urgency.
Sorry if I annoyed anyone.
> > Well, he was waiting.. but now perhaps he's wondering whether the necessary
> > first step is going to happen or not? That step is Matt (or whoever?)
> > finding the code, right, not setting up the SourceForge project.
> That is correct, I thought that Matt may have said that he had found it by
> now, and given it to someone. I didn't expect him to set up a sourceforge
> account or anything like that.
Last I remember, Leonardo thought he might have the source but
was waiting for permission to distribute it. (For the record, I
like the direction he was going with the source before the real
world took precedence.)
http://news.lugnet.com/trains/?n=15763
Meanwhile Matt had already basically given permission, but perhaps
not formally enough?
http://news.lugnet.com/trains/?n=15731
At this point I'd say it's still up to the guys with no free time
to find the source and put it somewhere.
> > But you still could do that anyway, ne?
> I presume that is probably the best thing to do with it, that way it won't
> get lost. It still may be better to wait for Matt to come up with the code
> before we do this step. I don't think it takes very long to set up an
> account on sourceforge.
I don't see the point setting up a sourceforge project without the
source. Seems kinda silly to me.
> Martin (Still waiting, just a little bit anxious!)
Me too...
Don
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Track Designer Registry
|
| (...) Wish I had dot com hours, they have to be better than video game company hours. :) (...) Good news, last night I was able to find the source package at home but my ISP was not very helpful and I couldn't upload it anywhere. I'll try again (...) (23 years ago, 9-Apr-02, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.cad)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Track Designer Registry
|
| (...) Matt would need a least a week to sort things out, so I wasn't worried at that stage. (...) That is correct, I thought that Matt may have said that he had found it by now, and given it to someone. I didn't expect him to set up a sourceforge (...) (23 years ago, 7-Apr-02, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.cad)
|
52 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
