Subject:
|
Re: does PT FAQ cover "CMDLINE"?...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Fri, 5 Apr 2002 18:35:15 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
248 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Franklin W. Cain writes:
> I've had several people ask me about the CMDLINE meta-statement.
> Shouldn't this meta-statement be covered in the FAQ for the Parts Tracker?
Thanks! I added your writeup to the PT FAQ. Let me know if everything's OK
or not.
<http://www.ldraw.org/library/tracker/ref/faq/>
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | does PT FAQ cover "CMDLINE"?...
|
| I've had several people ask me about the CMDLINE meta-statement. Shouldn't this meta-statement be covered in the FAQ for the Parts Tracker? (...) The CMDLINE meta-statement is a way of permitting the author to *document* certain run-time commands (...) (22 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
