Subject:
|
Re: the evolution of lego sorting
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.storage
|
Date:
|
Thu, 11 Jan 2001 23:23:33 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
8197 times
|
| |
|
|
"J.D. Forinash" wrote:
>
> In article <3A57F383.CCB73472@mindspring.com>,
> Frank Filz <ffilz@mindspring.com> wrote:
> > I find the resealable bag a very effective container. They are
> > reasonably efficiently packed into a tub, and it is relatively easy to
> > fluff them around to get the specific part or color you want up to the
> > top. I mostly use freezer strength quart and gallon sizes (and wish the
> > Hefty One Zip brand came in a 1/2 quart or smaller bag).
>
> I found this didn't work as well for me; even using "brand name" bags,
> I found that I wasn't completely sealing bags-of-1x2-tiles and such. Also,
> the bags aren't holding up well now five years later. I think they'll
> be more useful as I add more sorts of containers to my storage.
The Hefty One Zip bags seal very positively. The Ziploc Slideloc bags
don't always seal so well. I use freezer weight bags, which I hope will
last several years (though some have been damaged by getting jammed as a
drawer was opened, causing the corner of a brick to slice the bag open.
The bags without the slider are definitely harder to get a perfect seal.
Frank
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: the evolution of lego sorting
|
| (...) I found this didn't work as well for me; even using "brand name" bags, I found that I wasn't completely sealing bags-of-1x2-tiles and such. Also, the bags aren't holding up well now five years later. I think they'll be more useful as I add (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jan-01, to lugnet.storage)
|
42 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
