Subject:
|
Re: the evolution of lego sorting
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.storage
|
Date:
|
Tue, 9 Jan 2001 06:08:30 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
8274 times
|
| |
|
|
Remy Evard wrote:
> To be completely honest, I don't remember quite what happened for me
> in the beginning either. By the time I was 10 or so (20+ years ago),
> I was sorting by part, if I sorted at all. But I do remember sorting
> by color for about a day or two and realizing it just wouldn't work for
> me. So the early bits in this evolution were written more based on
> what I've seen people say they were doing here and a faint recollection
> of my really early Lego days.
As a child, I don't think we (me and my sisters) sorted the LEGO at all,
or at least not into more than a few bins (I just remembered my dad
built a box with drawers and dividers which might have been for the
LEGO), but then we didn't have all that much (basic bricks, a few
plates, classic doors and windows, slopes [but no peaks or corner
slopes], a train set, and a fire truck set, and probably a few other
pieces).
> > I have almost no sets archived in this way (though I have an overflow of
> > builtup sets on shelves, tables, or any other semi-flat surface).
>
> I've got quite a few, in part because those particular pieces are
> special. For example, my yellow castle is either displayed or archived..
> those pieces are never mixed in with the large pile. Same with some of
> my really really old sets, from the early 60s. Those pieces are too
> different from the rest to really mix in.o
I don't have enough older sets to worry about, of course I also have a
separate bucket of older used bricks from various eBay lots and the
kid's collection I bought...
> The other reason I archive by set is that I just plain enjoy building
> some of the sets as their own set. For example, the Guarded Inn is this
> way. I build it, set it up, then eventually need the shelf space, but
> can't bear to mix it in to the large pile because finding all the pieces
> is such a pain I'll never rebuild it... and it's too great to not
> rebuild every once in a while.
I haven't broken down any set which I really think I will want to
re-build, so so far, this isn't an issue for me.
> > I find the resealable bag a very effective container. They are
> > reasonably efficiently packed into a tub, and it is relatively easy to
> > fluff them around to get the specific part or color you want up to the
> > top. I mostly use freezer strength quart and gallon sizes (and wish the
> > Hefty One Zip brand came in a 1/2 quart or smaller bag).
>
> I don't like to do this because I find it pretty hard to find the one
> ziplock I'm looking for in a huge pile of ziplocks. (On the other hand,
> due to space constraints, I may have to start doing that. It's a very
> space efficient way to store.)
In a 3033 tub or similar sized tub, it isn't too hard to find the
particular bag. In a much larger tub it would be more of a problem.
Another nice thing about the bags is that if you want to work someplace
not next to your storage, you can take just the bags you will need (and
of course you will only take about 1/4 of those, so you will make
several trips back to the storage, and eventually the bags will
overwhelm your work area, meanwhile a couple of them have spilled over
and made a big mess).
> Yeah, my bricks and such overflowed long ago. But that didn't seem
> unusual. It did seem strange to me that I had so many horses I actually
> had a box on a shelf marked "horses". It was easy to envision this
> turning into an entire shelf with "dragons", "monkeys", "parrots",
> "polar bears"... overflow for animals makes a lot more sense.
I don't have any overflow boxes for animals, they so far have just
migrated into larger containers. The horses have done so once (but the
container they moved into also had tissue boxes tucked into it with
other animals. Those tissue boxes have for the most part been evicted
from the horse box.
> But that's definitely the big issue. The people who amaze me are the
> ones who have large lego collections, have time to build MOCs, and also
> have time to keep up with the article flow here and even post regularly.
> I'm guessing they don't have a 2-year old. :-)
Like Larry? Who not only buys and builds, but also puts together kits
(of course his LEGO may not be very well sorted)?
> > There's also another thing which causes a hitch in the system. If you
> > buy used LEGO, there's a whole ordeal of washing it. I have spent entire
> > days washing and laying out to dry, and then finally sorting or rarely
> > building the set.
>
> Net bags and a dishwasher.
I prefer to hand wash so I can scrub the pieces which need it, and be
gentle with the transparent parts etc. I'd also be concerned about the
temperature of my dishwasher.
Frank
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: the evolution of lego sorting
|
| (...) [Lots of snipping. Frank and I generated some serious text in here.] Thanks for the detailed response Frank... it was very insightful for me to read it from your perspective. (...) To be completely honest, I don't remember quite what happened (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jan-01, to lugnet.storage)
|
42 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
