To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.org.us.michlugOpen lugnet.org.us.michlug in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Organizations / United States / MichLUG / 604
603  |  605
Subject: 
Re: MichLUG Items in Debate not Appropriate
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.org.us.michlug
Date: 
Wed, 2 May 2001 12:06:19 GMT
Viewed: 
10 times
  
To All,

Well, since I am a laughing stock to the community now, I guess I will respond.

Then why reply to them?

Because it was a MichLUG item, that's why, and it got dragged here.

< Snipped rest of post >

yes, I see.

Well, after talking with Larry, and seeing some of what he said, I did
forget that TLC has made donations to the club, and having seen that now, I
do apologize for that. I forgot that and I apologize and concede that point.
We will not fly that flag of MichLUG here.

I apologize for doing this debate thing, I do not enjoy debate, I do not
like posting here, because of past issues, and try to avoid it whenever
possible. I stopped posting here for a lot of reasons, which I will not go into.

So I apologize to James Powell, to Larry, and to the entire commmunity for
being a laughing stock, I will not post things like this again, but if
anyone has a comment regarding this, I will look a little later. I also
apologize to todd for doing this, I wil make sure it does not happen again.

Sincerely,

Scott S.
--



Message has 2 Replies:
  (canceled)
 
  Re: MichLUG Items in Debate not Appropriate
 
To all, I don’t think Scott needs to apologize for anything. If the local food store (Meijer in my case) would give food to the Catholic Church to feed poor people. Would that mean Meijer is endorsing the Catholic Church? What it means is that (...) (24 years ago, 2-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.org.us.michlug)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: MichLUG Items in Debate not Appropriate
 
(...) Then why reply to them? (...) -no, what I am _not_ in favor of is having a non religious group become religious because of a minority opinion. I said, (...) (from .debate 10087) (...) What I wrote (I'm not sure you read it was: (...) -please (...) (24 years ago, 2-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.org.us.michlug)

36 Messages in This Thread:










Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR