To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.org.us.michlugOpen lugnet.org.us.michlug in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Organizations / United States / MichLUG / 1326
1325  |  1327
Subject: 
Re: Building priorities (was Re: U.S.S. Grand Rapids for the GATS)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.org.us.michlug
Date: 
Sat, 30 Jun 2001 21:39:42 GMT
Viewed: 
657 times
  
In lugnet.org.us.michlug, Larry Pieniazek writes:
In lugnet.org.us.michlug, Peter Guenther writes:
In lugnet.org.us.michlug, Larry Pieniazek writes:
In lugnet.org.us.michlug, Chris Leach writes:
Why we are talking about buildings it has pretty much agreed on
by most people in the club that personal MOC's will be placed on display
first then if room kits from other AFOLS (ie non Michigan people
designed/built)can fill any space left.This was discussed the other day at
Contraption.

Sorry I missed it. I have been working up the (small) space allotted to me
to make a good looking display without regard to where the buildings came
from. I think that's more important (to have it look cohesive and look like
the buildings belong together) than where they came from.

But if the entire group feels differently I will have to rethink what order
I put things in if there is a risk that some of that space will be taken
away because it was used for buildings built from (non LEGO) kits.

My point when we discussed it was that first and foremost, we do this for
fun.  We do it because we love building with LEGO.  For that reason, our
priority should be to give space to our members to display their own
handiwork.  If we've got stuff from non-members (and as far as I'm concerned
stock sets), then we fill in with that afterwards.  First and foremost, our
display is just that--OUR display, a representation of what the members of
MichLUG do.  I'm in it to show off my stuff a little bit, to have fun
building with LEGO, and to bring some fun into other people's lives.  Then
we take that output from our members and work it together to make it
cohesive, sure.  So my priority is involving the members first, then doing
the best display we can.

If we had a 10-year-old member, for instance, who put his heart into a
building for the display, I'd want it in the display--even if it looked like
a ten-year-old's building and didn't fit in that well.

In that same vein, as another example, while Kevin Wilson's buildings are
extraordinary (and I'd love to be able to buy them all), if a member were to
build a school that wasn't as good, I'd still want it in before Kevin's
because it's the work of a member.

I understand and accept that viewpoint but I guess my goal is a little
different in that I want to have the best display possible, one that wows
the crowd, not necessarily one that includes only work of members, or one
that is geared to be as inclusive as possible and sacrifices coherency or
cleanliness of form.

To that end, a large number of well done small buildings are needed, not
just a few big ones. IMHO, the last layout suffered from too many large
buildings that didn't have a "reason for being" and that were spaced way too
widely. (tall buildings typically appear in downtowns and get crowded together.)

So to that end while I would prefer to not give precedence to TLC buildings
unless they really *are* good (so that rules most of them out) I do want to
use the best buildings I can in the space I am responsible for, regardless
of where they come from. I built all of them myself, no one else built them
for me.

We do this for ourselves, true. But what floats *my* boat is wowing crowds.

I have a space allocated that is all of 1x5 plates. I will bring what I
think will make the most compelling display possible to occupy that space,
and it will be organised so that it makes sense as a whole. If the
membership then chooses to take that space away from me, so be it, I will
abide by that.

Larry ,Peter,Rick and all I am cutting down on more of my things to make
room for more of your guys buildings etc.I want to see if i can get back
enough water for Ricks sub for one thing.I want to make sure there is enough
room etc.People want to bring more so this is a nice problem to have.I may
eliminate my neighborhood/fire station or the airport to make more room.I
also may see if we can get at least 2 more tables.If i can that alone will
give us alot more space for buildings.



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Building priorities (was Re: U.S.S. Grand Rapids for the GATS)
 
Definitely don't eliminate the airport. If you need to, cut it down, but I don't want to lose it--or your fire station. Peter (...) (23 years ago, 30-Jun-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Building priorities (was Re: U.S.S. Grand Rapids for the GATS)
 
(...) I understand and accept that viewpoint but I guess my goal is a little different in that I want to have the best display possible, one that wows the crowd, not necessarily one that includes only work of members, or one that is geared to be as (...) (23 years ago, 30-Jun-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)

48 Messages in This Thread:















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR