Subject:
|
Re: U.S.S. Grand Rapids for the GATS
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.us.michlug
|
Date:
|
Sat, 30 Jun 2001 01:10:06 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
528 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.us.michlug, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> Rick may have been trying to fit his sub into the space allotted to him in
> the layout.
I was. I am planning a bigger one when i can get a poo-load of red and black.
> But it does beg the question, is it so small that it's too far below minifig
> scale even with selective compression? These things are monster sized. I
> would tend to vote "no it isn't" because I think it's cute and will be a
> good conversation starter on the layout.
>
> Especially since it will be in the corner! That's prime space.
I'll sell it to ya for 3 Galaxy Exolprers.
> Rick may want to consider working up some details to go with it... a wharf
> that it's tied up at, some guards, some sailors loading stuff, maybe some
> guy fishing who's actually a spy with binoculars, a small police boat
> patrolling for saboteurs, etc. etc...
I may need some help on this part.
That's some neat stuff, but isn't the entire display flat? How would a warf
fit in?
Rick
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: U.S.S. Grand Rapids for the GATS
|
| (...) I think the wharf could be done pretty well with the ramp and elevated train platform pieces. It would definitely be lower than your sub, though. In any case, spacewise I don't think we can consider it, from what I've seen of the layout. The (...) (23 years ago, 30-Jun-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
| | | Re: U.S.S. Grand Rapids for the GATS
|
| (...) Exolprers? I think I have some (that I can claim are) of those... (lessee, a timmy sitting on a 4x4 quad inverse with two 2x8 black plates for wings. Yes, I have 3 of those, no problem) (...) YOu have to fake a depression. That is, use a few (...) (23 years ago, 30-Jun-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: U.S.S. Grand Rapids for the GATS
|
| (...) Rick may have been trying to fit his sub into the space allotted to him in the layout. But it does beg the question, is it so small that it's too far below minifig scale even with selective compression? These things are monster sized. I would (...) (23 years ago, 29-Jun-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
48 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
