To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.org.us.michlugOpen lugnet.org.us.michlug in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Organizations / United States / MichLUG / 1325
1324  |  1326
Subject: 
Re: Building priorities (was Re: U.S.S. Grand Rapids for the GATS)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.org.us.michlug
Date: 
Sat, 30 Jun 2001 21:12:01 GMT
Viewed: 
601 times
  
In lugnet.org.us.michlug, Larry Pieniazek writes:

To that end, a large number of well done small buildings are needed, not
just a few big ones. IMHO, the last layout suffered from too many large
buildings that didn't have a "reason for being" and that were spaced way too
widely. (tall buildings typically appear in downtowns and get crowded together.)

I'm in agreement with you here--though I think Chris and Amy have some
terrific large buildings that should definitely be part of the display.

So to that end while I would prefer to not give precedence to TLC buildings
unless they really *are* good (so that rules most of them out) I do want to
use the best buildings I can in the space I am responsible for, regardless
of where they come from. I built all of them myself, no one else built them
for me.

I also agree with you that we shouldn't spend space on stock TLC
buildings--maybe a couple that really stand out.  The way we worked the
airport shuttle station in, for instance (although since it was an
afterthought it wasn't visible enough), in January.

We do this for ourselves, true. But what floats *my* boat is wowing crowds.

I have a space allocated that is all of 1x5 plates. I will bring what I
think will make the most compelling display possible to occupy that space,
and it will be organised so that it makes sense as a whole. If the
membership then chooses to take that space away from me, so be it, I will
abide by that.

No, I'm talking about the general principle here, not the specific layout.
I haven't been involved enough in the layout to know who's getting what
space.  You're welcome to use your space as you wish and I don't think
anyone wants to take it away from you--but on the other hand I wouldn't want
to take/reduce someone else's space away for a GoB or other non-member's
building--no matter how superb.

Peter



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Building priorities (was Re: U.S.S. Grand Rapids for the GATS)
 
(...) I understand and accept that viewpoint but I guess my goal is a little different in that I want to have the best display possible, one that wows the crowd, not necessarily one that includes only work of members, or one that is geared to be as (...) (23 years ago, 30-Jun-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)

48 Messages in This Thread:















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR