Subject:
|
Re: Excellent news!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 4 Jan 2006 16:56:04 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1703 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd wrote:
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Assure me that everyone ever executed was guilty and I’ll agree to the
death penalty. If not, then we have murdered the innocent in the name of
justice.
|
|
|
|
|
So let me get this straight-- is it conditional for me to prove that everyone
ever executed actually committed their crimes and then you’ll agree to the death
penalty?
What about the fate of a man who kills 5 women and children during a botched
bank robbery where he is captured at the scene. Presumably, then, you feel
comfortable enough to execute him?
How about you, Dave!?
JOHN
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Excellent news!
|
| (...) Since I dragged Bruce back into this, I'll field the question for him (though he's welcome to refute or add to it, of course!) (...) Of course not! The execution of a person who has been rendered harmless is indistinguishable from coldblooded (...) (19 years ago, 4-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | Re: Excellent news!
|
| (...) You've summed it up very nicely, except that you state it as an absolute rather than a condition for me to even consider the question. (...) Here's a sword - are you willing to personally execute him yourself? No, it's not a facetious (...) (19 years ago, 4-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
55 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
