Subject:
|
Re: Excellent news!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 3 Mar 2005 15:56:13 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1023 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Steve Bliss wrote:
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler wrote:
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
Which is more precious: one persons life or that same persons freedom?
I guess thats up to the person, assuming that he or she is competent to
make that decision (which, I grant, is another debate in itself) However,
given the fact that so many prisoners continue to appeal their death
sentences in hope of commuting them to life-without-parole, Id have to
conclude that, for these people at least, life is more precious than
freedom.
|
(thats not actually a fair example, because those prisoners are trying to
get from death-without-freedom to life-without-freedom. Its not an exchange
of life and freedom.)
|
Im not sure what death-without-freedom means, or why it might be of any value
to the soon-to-be-deceased.
Or did you mean inescapable death versus life without possibility of parole?
|
Obtaining life-without-freedom opens the possibility of it being changed
later to life-with-freedom. So even if one persons freedom is more
important than one persons life, that one person might still opt for
life-without-freedom over death (with or without freedom).
|
If the option were put forth as life with absolutely no possibility of
parole, do you think that death-row convicts would still seek it in preference
to execution?
Dave!
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Excellent news!
|
| (...) (that's not actually a fair example, because those prisoners are trying to get from death-without-freedom to life-without-freedom. It's not an exchange of life and freedom.) Obtaining life-without-freedom opens the possibility of it being (...) (20 years ago, 3-Mar-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
55 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|