Subject:
|
Re: Set #10021 has been spotted at Shop at Home!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.loc.nl, lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 20 Jun 2002 14:29:03 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
77 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.loc.nl, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.loc.nl, Frank Filz writes:
> > William R Ward wrote:
> > > This is the key point. What possible use could there be for a 1x1
> > > window in new sets? The old style 1x2x2 and 1x2x4 and other sizes of
> > > windows are no longer made, so the 1x1 wouldn't have any "family" to
> > > be used alongside of. It's just not "cool" enough to warrant use in a
> > > new set. Can you imagine a Harry Potter or Star Wars set using this
> > > piece? And I don't just mean using this piece, I mean *needing* it,
> > > enough to justify the cost of creating a mold? If not, forget it.
> >
> > Hmm, I seem to have ordered a bag of white classic 1x2x2 windows from
> > S@H a year or so ago...
>
> They're the new ones, not the old ones. They don't have a projecting lip
> that juts out in front at the bottom, as did the entire old family except
> the 1x6x3 . If the 1x1 was revived a decision would need to be made whether
> to revive it exactly (meaning it can't sit behind a brick as the lip blocks
> it) or redesign it somewhat (meaning it is stylistically compatible with the
> new 1x2x2
>
> Academically I'd vote for compatible rather than exact replacement.
Are you sure about that lip on the windows, Larry? I'm at work right now
and can't check, but I seem to recall that the only window that had that
annoying protruding bottom lip that interfered with bricks in front was the
1x6x3. I thought the 1x4x2, 1x3x2, 1x2x2, 1x1x2, 1x1x1 didn't have the
extended lip, even on the old ones. I'll check my windows tonight.
Dave!!
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
53 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|