Subject:
|
Re: Time cruisers or Time losers? (was:Re: Pirate/castle helmet...)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 24 Mar 2000 10:14:16 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
sgore@=stopspam=superonline.com
|
Viewed:
|
2104 times
|
| |
|
|
Shiri Dori wrote:
>
> In lugnet.general, Frank Filz writes:
<snip>
> > More seriously, they just don't interract well with any other LEGO
> > theme,
>
> Whaddaya mean by that? I don't think that's a good argument. There's NO theme
> that just fits/interacts with other themes as it is. Castle sets won't fit
> next to space sets, no matter what you say. Trains don't mix well with
> Pirates. You can't put a (lego) robot R2D2 next to a town and say that they
> work well together. (OK, you can-- but you'd be lying ;)
Actually, Time Thingies are the way to make themes interacting with each
other. If you have means to travel in time, you can relate
castle/town/space to each other..:-)
Not that I like Time Thingies, by the way. I'm not a collector, but
builder/modeler mainly, and buy sets for pieces, but mostly if the
featured model satisfies me somehow.
>
> Truly, I think that the AFOL community is somewhat prejudiced against TC&TT
> sets... the sooner we put the differences behind us, the better... ;-)
The dislike about the Time Thingies is something that I can understand,
but I just can't understand what is it wrong with Timmy boy. I have only
two, and although not being so cute, not that bad either, I think.
Selçuk
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
44 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
