Subject:
|
Re: Speculation on the nature of minifigs (moved from Dear LEGO)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 8 Mar 2000 22:14:24 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
737 times
|
| |
|
|
Gary Istok skrev i meddelandet <38C66ED9.5E253B41@umich.edu>...
>
> OK as a professed LEGO Archeologist, and sometimes LEGO Anthropologist, • LEGO...
> minifigs first showed up on the planet several decades ago. They were a • limbless
> species (known by their Latin name of Minifigicus Stifficanus) that first • evolved
> circa 1973. They were a faceless, limbless species that didn't survive long
> because of their handicaps. In 1977 a new species evolved called Minifigicus
> Erectus, which developed arms, legs and faces. This species is very • prolific, and
> is still with us today.
I think the 'Stifficanus' should be 'Rigorius'?
And the 'Erectus'? Aren't they really 'Mobilus'? I mean, even the Stifficanus
are standing erect.
What about the Minifigicus Maximus (or are those Maxifigicus
Neanderthalensis)?
They have faces, torsos, arms, but no real legs - and are much bigger. Are
they part of the evolution chain, or are they a dead end? Perhaps they are the
forefathers of Technifigus Mobilus?
--
Anders Isaksson, Sweden
BlockCAD: http://user.tninet.se/~hbh828t/proglego.htm
Gallery: http://user.tninet.se/~hbh828t/gallery.htm
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
49 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
